From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-45118-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>) id 1Q4cZc-0001hD-8i for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 17:19:20 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AB8791C00A; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 17:19:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 529201C002 for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 17:18:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC0E51B40F6 for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 17:18:37 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -2.864 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.864 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-0.265, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uFg1tS8V6AhV for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 17:18:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 409131B40CB for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 17:18:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <lnx-gentoo-dev@m.gmane.org>) id 1Q4cYk-0006X0-F5 for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 19:18:26 +0200 Received: from athedsl-387633.home.otenet.gr ([79.131.66.47]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 19:18:26 +0200 Received: from realnc by athedsl-387633.home.otenet.gr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 19:18:26 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@arcor.de> Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Please enhance your USE descriptions! Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 19:19:01 +0300 Organization: Lucas Barks Message-ID: <imt48h$6of$1@dough.gmane.org> References: <4D91EBB9.1020506@gentoo.org> <AANLkTi=xQ-Y06Zc4_zBrobdtiBFEVfN-Sn6J0w7MKEze@mail.gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: athedsl-387633.home.otenet.gr User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110321 Thunderbird/3.1.9 In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=xQ-Y06Zc4_zBrobdtiBFEVfN-Sn6J0w7MKEze@mail.gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 7d9026498018e9ee7412b080180adeb0 On 03/29/2011 08:00 PM, Matt Turner wrote: > On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 2:24 PM, justin<jlec@gentoo.org> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> the descriptions of USE flags should explain what the USE is good for. >> In my opinion some thing like >> >> Enables foo intergration >> or >> Enables support for foo >> >> if it isn't totally clear what "foo" is, sucks!! There are many, many >> description which do not tell me as a user without googling what I could >> enable or not. That doesn't make gentoo very user friendly! >> >> So please enhance you descriptions!! >> >> >> Thanks justin > > One USE flag I remember in particular bothering me was > gnome-extra/gnome-games' guile USE flag. > > The global description says "guile - Adds support for the guile Scheme > interpreter" but this flag is actually determines whether a number of > games are installed by this package. The most extreme one I remember is the "gtk" flag of GCC: "Adds support for x11-libs/gtk+ (The GIMP Toolkit)" Hmm, OK. So without that flag, GCC won't be able to build gtk? Or gimp? Or any software using gtk?