From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-45118-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1Q4cZc-0001hD-8i
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 17:19:20 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AB8791C00A;
	Tue, 29 Mar 2011 17:19:10 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 529201C002
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 17:18:38 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC0E51B40F6
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 17:18:37 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at gentoo.org
X-Spam-Score: -2.864
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.864 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-0.265,
	BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id uFg1tS8V6AhV for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>;
	Tue, 29 Mar 2011 17:18:31 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12])
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 409131B40CB
	for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 17:18:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <lnx-gentoo-dev@m.gmane.org>)
	id 1Q4cYk-0006X0-F5
	for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 19:18:26 +0200
Received: from athedsl-387633.home.otenet.gr ([79.131.66.47])
        by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
        id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
        for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 19:18:26 +0200
Received: from realnc by athedsl-387633.home.otenet.gr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
        id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
        for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 19:18:26 +0200
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
From: Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@arcor.de>
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Please enhance your USE descriptions!
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 19:19:01 +0300
Organization: Lucas Barks
Message-ID: <imt48h$6of$1@dough.gmane.org>
References: <4D91EBB9.1020506@gentoo.org> <AANLkTi=xQ-Y06Zc4_zBrobdtiBFEVfN-Sn6J0w7MKEze@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: athedsl-387633.home.otenet.gr
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110321 Thunderbird/3.1.9
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=xQ-Y06Zc4_zBrobdtiBFEVfN-Sn6J0w7MKEze@mail.gmail.com>
X-Archives-Salt: 
X-Archives-Hash: 7d9026498018e9ee7412b080180adeb0

On 03/29/2011 08:00 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 2:24 PM, justin<jlec@gentoo.org>  wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> the descriptions of USE flags should explain what the USE is good for.
>> In my opinion some thing like
>>
>> Enables foo intergration
>> or
>> Enables support for foo
>>
>> if it isn't totally clear what "foo" is, sucks!! There are many, many
>> description which do not tell me as a user without googling what I could
>> enable or not. That doesn't make gentoo very user friendly!
>>
>> So please enhance you descriptions!!
>>
>>
>> Thanks justin
>
> One USE flag I remember in particular bothering me was
> gnome-extra/gnome-games' guile USE flag.
>
> The global description says "guile - Adds support for the guile Scheme
> interpreter" but this flag is actually determines whether a number of
> games are installed by this package.

The most extreme one I remember is the "gtk" flag of GCC:

   "Adds support for x11-libs/gtk+ (The GIMP Toolkit)"

Hmm, OK. So without that flag, GCC won't be able to build gtk?  Or gimp? 
  Or any software using gtk?