From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-41536-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1OSbVR-00022H-5q
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 26 Jun 2010 19:57:37 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 625D7E0BBD;
Sat, 26 Jun 2010 19:57:34 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03D25E0B7D
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 26 Jun 2010 19:57:24 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1CFA1B40F9
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 26 Jun 2010 19:57:23 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org
X-Spam-Score: -1.754
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.754 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-1.569,
BAYES_40=-0.185]
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 5Rschj7u9onw for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>;
Sat, 26 Jun 2010 19:57:17 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12])
by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D7FA1B40A1
for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Sat, 26 Jun 2010 19:57:15 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69)
(envelope-from <lnx-gentoo-dev@m.gmane.org>)
id 1OSbUz-0001Vj-Hj
for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Sat, 26 Jun 2010 21:57:09 +0200
Received: from athedsl-394623.home.otenet.gr ([79.131.93.125])
by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Sat, 26 Jun 2010 21:57:09 +0200
Received: from realnc by athedsl-394623.home.otenet.gr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Sat, 26 Jun 2010 21:57:09 +0200
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
From: Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@arcor.de>
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: FYI: Rules for distro-friendly packages
Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2010 22:57:15 +0300
Organization: Lucas Barks
Message-ID: <i05m2d$1h4$1@dough.gmane.org>
References: <20100625201738.GA4789@nibiru.local> <4C252C8E.8020408@gentoo.org> <20100626193915.GD4789@nibiru.local>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: athedsl-394623.home.otenet.gr
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.4) Gecko/20100626 Thunderbird/3.1
In-Reply-To: <20100626193915.GD4789@nibiru.local>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Archives-Salt: 7f465164-0bc4-4904-88e4-d2f21094fb72
X-Archives-Hash: 8834fa5e12db96a485883aa8e0fbfccf
On 06/26/2010 10:39 PM, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> * Petteri R=E4ty<betelgeuse@gentoo.org> schrieb:
>
>> There should be useful stuff here:
>> http://video.fosdem.org/2010/devrooms/distributions/How_to_be_a_good_u=
pstream.ogv
>
>[...[
> #2 One point i don't agree is the "dont add -Werror" rule. actually,
> i'm thinking of making -Wall and -Werror mandatory. if some
> package doenst build fine, it's simply broken. period.
That's the most hilarious thing I've read in ages. xD