From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NeSpo-0002K0-BK for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2010 12:35:29 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 24C93E0D57; Mon, 8 Feb 2010 12:35:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D232FE0D3A for ; Mon, 8 Feb 2010 12:35:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 701AF1B408B for ; Mon, 8 Feb 2010 12:35:16 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -3.073 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.073 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-0.474, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id J-3LnxuBo8zr for ; Mon, 8 Feb 2010 12:35:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E253E1B42C8 for ; Mon, 8 Feb 2010 12:35:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NeSpV-0004bG-E8 for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2010 13:35:05 +0100 Received: from athedsl-377952.home.otenet.gr ([79.131.28.94]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 08 Feb 2010 13:35:05 +0100 Received: from realnc by athedsl-377952.home.otenet.gr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 08 Feb 2010 13:35:05 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Nikos Chantziaras Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: "X" vs "gtk" USE flags Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2010 14:34:08 +0200 Organization: Lucas Barks Message-ID: References: <20100208131131.7a034559@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: athedsl-377952.home.otenet.gr User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100206 Thunderbird/3.0.1 In-Reply-To: <20100208131131.7a034559@gentoo.org> Sender: news X-Archives-Salt: 3a1ac943-a22f-42ea-a948-6c059657b8dd X-Archives-Hash: fcefbb5d38603e3b4516b90fc30436d6 On 02/08/2010 02:11 PM, Christian Faulhammer wrote: > Hi, > > Nikos Chantziaras: >> A Gnome user probably has "X gtk -qt" in make.conf, while a KDE user >> has "X qt -gtk" in hope to have programs that support both Gtk and Qt >> being built with the toolkit that is more native to his DE. When a >> package has a GUI tool that is able to only use one of those >> toolkits, people who have it disabled in make.conf will get no GUI >> tool at all even though they have "X" in their USE flags. > > Your proposal does not look to appealing to me. What about people > trying to keep "pollution" down and avoid one or the other toolkit? This would mean that we favor one group of people over another :P