From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1O5joj-0005ne-Jk for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 18:11:02 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CCD75E0841; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 18:10:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pz0-f182.google.com (mail-pz0-f182.google.com [209.85.222.182]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5FC1E062C for ; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 18:10:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pzk12 with SMTP id 12so7715796pzk.32 for ; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 11:10:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:sender:received :in-reply-to:references:from:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id :subject:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=JqMgg8fnzJwwJo3MLvmMLUvgE/M3+169STh72PJ5XGA=; b=E5wPfHJcWdl+A/TJRtD6P2uhgsR+TiNuCLA+HoSyTRuODBxCwd80FZt7RYTD5Bj1Zt xLzTobE4MArkGae5IYIVJUJuydrWAn5Td1gx6ClIFg+9l4wADp8ItlyT2ze3svkkFxwa /zl7XJnii2wPd7xyA3248lEi7cxpSa5XDpywM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=Dsa6yAjy8UwgWpRMS0btfQ0oC6b6DcWCnOhIVAr+Hr2vEYcIGRzKh03B/uQzyimzAO QPV5Cj/a9ECQak8xIq8RePWA35RFA6se+l5PVMvS0UoOkPzuzv29W6XaXb+HCDqGxNN1 tVjV4+zdtsfwya9l54X2zdu2DQUYchOmuNgZc= Received: by 10.141.125.5 with SMTP id c5mr1655390rvn.254.1272132648135; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 11:10:48 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: arunissatan@gmail.com Received: by 10.141.20.2 with HTTP; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 11:10:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4BD32D26.5090005@gentoo.org> References: <4BD32D26.5090005@gentoo.org> From: Arun Raghavan Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 23:40:28 +0530 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 51bec37e4c05ebfe Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Requiring two sets of eyes for all eclass commits To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 94200210-4cc2-4e31-b392-4842d05d898f X-Archives-Hash: 0226cdb31d19cfdecb612fce2e18060d On 24 April 2010 23:10, Petteri R=E4ty wrote: > 17:34 < Betelgeuse> robbat2|na: how easy to it to prevent commits to CVS > if the commit message doesn't match a certain pattern? > 17:36 <@robbat2|na> go and checkout the CVSROOT and there should be an > example there > 17:37 < Betelgeuse> robbat2|na: Ok so doable then. Thanks. > > What do you think about not allowing commits to eclasses without > mentioning an another developer who has reviewed and approved the diff > in the commit message? There's enough people on gentoo-dev for urgent > stuff too. Were there recent breakages to make this necessary? Cheers, --=20 Arun Raghavan http://arunraghavan.net/ (Ford_Prefect | Gentoo) & (arunsr | GNOME)