From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-34258-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1LWcvV-0003OS-PK
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 09 Feb 2009 20:40:22 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0138FE0502;
Mon, 9 Feb 2009 20:40:14 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C93DFE0502
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 9 Feb 2009 20:40:13 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E0FD656F4
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 9 Feb 2009 20:40:13 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org
X-Spam-Score: -3.409
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.409 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=0.190,
BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 1fzkWC5QNN5R for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>;
Mon, 9 Feb 2009 20:40:07 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2])
(using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACE816467F
for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Mon, 9 Feb 2009 20:40:05 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from root by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43)
id 1LWcvC-00046N-90
for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Mon, 09 Feb 2009 20:40:02 +0000
Received: from athedsl-106107.home.otenet.gr ([87.203.54.25])
by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Mon, 09 Feb 2009 20:40:02 +0000
Received: from realnc by athedsl-106107.home.otenet.gr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Mon, 09 Feb 2009 20:40:02 +0000
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
From: Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@arcor.de>
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: midnight commander -> which screen library
Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2009 22:36:00 +0200
Organization: Lucas Barks
Message-ID: <gmq43f$l10$2@ger.gmane.org>
References: <20090130134224.GA24643@nibiru.local> <gmpsrm$mht$3@ger.gmane.org> <200902091437.59281.vapier@gentoo.org>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: athedsl-106107.home.otenet.gr
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090203)
In-Reply-To: <200902091437.59281.vapier@gentoo.org>
Sender: news <news@ger.gmane.org>
X-Archives-Salt: f6c2838c-3e5f-4aba-b06a-420efe4fb7c4
X-Archives-Hash: 9f213e19eeec2c72ed007e561d1f0d9f
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Monday 09 February 2009 13:32:24 Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
>>> BTW: 4.6.2 is soon coming (only 1 bug left) :)
>> unicode? ( >=sys-libs/slang-2.1.3 )
>> !unicode? ( sys-libs/ncurses )
>>
>> If Unicode isn't possible with ncurses, keep slang :P No Unicode
>> support would be... not good.
>
> that doesnt make any sense. both ncurses and slang work just fine with and
> without unicode.
MC doesn't. A patch adds Unicode to MC. It's for slang only.
Anyway, I just saw that there's a new patch listed in MC's homepage that
seems to add Unicode. I suppose Gentoo will switch to that and drop the
current slang patch.