From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-34251-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>) id 1LWayy-000446-5S for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 09 Feb 2009 18:35:48 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 12CC4E0297; Mon, 9 Feb 2009 18:35:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5286E0297 for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 9 Feb 2009 18:35:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8442FB47BE for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 9 Feb 2009 18:35:15 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -3.407 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.407 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=0.192, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Xs+gdNpauFgK for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 9 Feb 2009 18:35:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F3FEB478C for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Mon, 9 Feb 2009 18:35:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from root by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1LWayF-0007YL-5J for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Mon, 09 Feb 2009 18:35:03 +0000 Received: from athedsl-106107.home.otenet.gr ([87.203.54.25]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Mon, 09 Feb 2009 18:35:03 +0000 Received: from realnc by athedsl-106107.home.otenet.gr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Mon, 09 Feb 2009 18:35:03 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@arcor.de> Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: midnight commander -> which screen library Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2009 20:32:24 +0200 Organization: Lucas Barks Message-ID: <gmpsrm$mht$3@ger.gmane.org> References: <20090130134224.GA24643@nibiru.local> Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: athedsl-106107.home.otenet.gr User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090203) In-Reply-To: <20090130134224.GA24643@nibiru.local> Sender: news <news@ger.gmane.org> X-Archives-Salt: 3d749373-f257-4492-8204-3f9e10dc962f X-Archives-Hash: 15adf378e4690e1dae79c077d6e24aac Enrico Weigelt wrote: > Hi folks, > > > @mc.o (*1) we're currently discussing which screen library to keep. > Either ncurses or slang will be dropped (bundled slang will anyway) > Both have their pros and cons, so we haven't decided yet. > > What do you suggest, which screen library to keep ? > > BTW: 4.6.2 is soon coming (only 1 bug left) :) unicode? ( >=sys-libs/slang-2.1.3 ) !unicode? ( sys-libs/ncurses ) If Unicode isn't possible with ncurses, keep slang :P No Unicode support would be... not good.