From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-34251-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1LWayy-000446-5S
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 09 Feb 2009 18:35:48 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 12CC4E0297;
Mon, 9 Feb 2009 18:35:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5286E0297
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 9 Feb 2009 18:35:15 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8442FB47BE
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 9 Feb 2009 18:35:15 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org
X-Spam-Score: -3.407
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.407 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=0.192,
BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id Xs+gdNpauFgK for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>;
Mon, 9 Feb 2009 18:35:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2])
(using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F3FEB478C
for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Mon, 9 Feb 2009 18:35:06 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from root by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43)
id 1LWayF-0007YL-5J
for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Mon, 09 Feb 2009 18:35:03 +0000
Received: from athedsl-106107.home.otenet.gr ([87.203.54.25])
by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Mon, 09 Feb 2009 18:35:03 +0000
Received: from realnc by athedsl-106107.home.otenet.gr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Mon, 09 Feb 2009 18:35:03 +0000
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
From: Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@arcor.de>
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: midnight commander -> which screen library
Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2009 20:32:24 +0200
Organization: Lucas Barks
Message-ID: <gmpsrm$mht$3@ger.gmane.org>
References: <20090130134224.GA24643@nibiru.local>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: athedsl-106107.home.otenet.gr
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090203)
In-Reply-To: <20090130134224.GA24643@nibiru.local>
Sender: news <news@ger.gmane.org>
X-Archives-Salt: 3d749373-f257-4492-8204-3f9e10dc962f
X-Archives-Hash: 15adf378e4690e1dae79c077d6e24aac
Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
>
> @mc.o (*1) we're currently discussing which screen library to keep.
> Either ncurses or slang will be dropped (bundled slang will anyway)
> Both have their pros and cons, so we haven't decided yet.
>
> What do you suggest, which screen library to keep ?
>
> BTW: 4.6.2 is soon coming (only 1 bug left) :)
unicode? ( >=sys-libs/slang-2.1.3 )
!unicode? ( sys-libs/ncurses )
If Unicode isn't possible with ncurses, keep slang :P No Unicode
support would be... not good.