From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KsHvX-0006hy-NS for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 21 Oct 2008 14:09:39 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 528D0E0251; Tue, 21 Oct 2008 14:09:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0204CE0251 for ; Tue, 21 Oct 2008 14:09:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CD5564B5C for ; Tue, 21 Oct 2008 14:09:37 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -1.257 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.257 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=0.275, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO=2.067] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fjyahgzSYxwA for ; Tue, 21 Oct 2008 14:09:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BFAD64C16 for ; Tue, 21 Oct 2008 14:09:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1KsHvF-0004cf-BJ for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Tue, 21 Oct 2008 14:09:21 +0000 Received: from 212.126.163.234 ([212.126.163.234]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 21 Oct 2008 14:09:21 +0000 Received: from dev-zero by 212.126.163.234 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 21 Oct 2008 14:09:21 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Tiziano =?ISO-8859-1?Q?M=FCller?= Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] New keywords for non-Gentoo Linux platforms Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 16:09:12 +0200 Organization: Gentoo Message-ID: References: <20081009181101.GE21770@gentoo.org> <1224253365.12512.47.camel@sapc154.salomon.at> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 212.126.163.234 User-Agent: KNode/0.10.9 Sender: news X-Archives-Salt: e160f25a-5074-4891-b5e9-a40b81511a8e X-Archives-Hash: 146831485f97a5fb8281185ebbe81c8c Michael Haubenwallner wrote: > > On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 20:11 +0200, Fabian Groffen wrote: > >> sparc-solaris >> sparc64-solaris >> x64-solaris >> x86-solaris > >> Perhaps using KEYWORDS for Prefix keywords is not the best thing to do, >> and should we use something like PREFIX_KEYWORDS? > > Maybe there is one thing we should consider: > Since the Solaris kernel is Open now (=OpenSolaris), one could have the > strange idea of adding some "sys-kernel/solaris-sources-2.11.ebuild", to > build some distribution eventually called "Gentoo Solaris", which might > be comparable to Nexenta[1], which uses Debian's APT AFAICS. Already on my agenda once I've got internet at home again, my server up and running and all my current bugs squashed. > > As "Gentoo Solaris" would not be the same as "Gentoo Prefix on Solaris", > it should not share the *-solaris keywords used for Prefix via the same > KEYWORDS-setting. what about a new generic schema like: CPU-OS[-prefix] with the possibility of shell expansion in KEYWORDS to have something like this: KEYWORDS="{x86,sparc}-linux" or KEYWORDS="linux: x86 sparc ppc freebsd: x86 sparc solaris-prefix: sparc" ? Cheers, Tiziano