From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KrB15-00046q-Nc for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 18 Oct 2008 12:34:47 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3E36FE0288; Sat, 18 Oct 2008 12:34:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17297E0288 for ; Sat, 18 Oct 2008 12:34:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD2706464B for ; Sat, 18 Oct 2008 12:34:44 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -0.811 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.811 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=0.721, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO=2.067] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K0YpMCo7Dtto for ; Sat, 18 Oct 2008 12:34:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 092B364D4C for ; Sat, 18 Oct 2008 12:34:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1KrB0o-0000Po-C7 for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Sat, 18 Oct 2008 12:34:30 +0000 Received: from 82.152.221.237 ([82.152.221.237]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 18 Oct 2008 12:34:30 +0000 Received: from slong by 82.152.221.237 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 18 Oct 2008 12:34:30 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Steve Long Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: [RFC] some global useflags Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 13:22:09 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20081015183632.499d5e6c@gentoo.org> <20081015174338.5ee92974@googlemail.com> <20081015211631.190f140a@googlemail.com> <20081016222655.5506cf23@googlemail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.152.221.237 User-Agent: KNode/0.10.9 Sender: news X-Archives-Salt: 45b28c82-ddf1-4eea-aa4c-4af7f8e93946 X-Archives-Hash: 78f926ed906d026d8720f2d0bad45e26 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Thu, 16 Oct 2008 22:06:40 +0100 > Steve Long wrote: >> > Have a look at, for example, [1], where Mike already gave you an >> > answer one of the previous times we discussed it. >> > >> I'm aware of the prior discussion. >> Re-read it, and tell me what it breaks, if you can. > > Well, which part of the previous times it's been explained to you didn't > you understand? > No one has ever given me a technical reason. I thought you might have light to shed; clearly not. Please don't reply to my posts if you don't have any actual information to add; I realise you like long fruitless mail 'discussions', and apparently have lots of time for them, but I don't, and I don't enjoy reading them either. This kind of one-liner with zero content, and no intent but to insult, should simply be binned without sending imo.