From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-33054-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1KnBBu-0003PV-94
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 07 Oct 2008 11:57:26 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8FCF7E0329;
	Tue,  7 Oct 2008 11:57:25 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64876E0329
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue,  7 Oct 2008 11:57:25 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27BCA64755
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue,  7 Oct 2008 11:57:24 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org
X-Spam-Score: -1.475
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.475 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=0.057,
	BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO=2.067]
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id Nd8tAzpvwIeq for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>;
	Tue,  7 Oct 2008 11:57:18 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6532664731
	for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Tue,  7 Oct 2008 11:57:15 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43)
	id 1KnBBZ-0001u6-4F
	for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Tue, 07 Oct 2008 11:57:05 +0000
Received: from 91.85.163.77 ([91.85.163.77])
        by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
        id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
        for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Tue, 07 Oct 2008 11:57:05 +0000
Received: from slong by 91.85.163.77 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
        id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
        for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Tue, 07 Oct 2008 11:57:05 +0000
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
From:  Steve Long <slong@rathaus.eclipse.co.uk>
Subject: [gentoo-dev]  Re: Projects without a homepage, and valid contents of HOMEPAGE (per bug 239268)
Date:  Tue, 07 Oct 2008 12:46:24 +0100
Message-ID:  <gcfiq7$i4h$1@ger.gmane.org>
References:  <20081005104420.GE15949@curie-int.orbis-terrarum.net> <20081005212329.3ac8b68e@googlemail.com> <200810052355.43253.bangert@gentoo.org> <200810061559.46534.rbu@gentoo.org>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version:  1.0
Content-Type:  text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding:  7Bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 91.85.163.77
User-Agent: KNode/0.10.9
Sender: news <news@ger.gmane.org>
X-Archives-Salt: 3c8f2be7-ad08-42ae-9f7c-e94444f611d2
X-Archives-Hash: b113f00a01053a4f5e68bc14ea81a1b6

Robert Buchholz wrote:

> On Sunday 05 October 2008, Thilo Bangert wrote:
>> Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@googlemail.com> said:
>> > On Sun, 5 Oct 2008 03:44:20 -0700
>> >
>> > "Robin H. Johnson" <robbat2@gentoo.org> wrote:
>> > > Either we need special cases to declare that it no longer has a
>> > > homepage, or we need to allow the empty HOMEPAGE.
>> >
>> > HOMEPAGE="( )"
>>
>> HOMEPAGE="http://this-package-has-no-homepage.gentoo.org/"
> 
> Why not use our package site for this, i.e.
> HOMEPAGE="http://packages.gentoo.org/package/${CAT}/${PN}"
> 
> i.e. for this particular use case,
> http://packages.gentoo.org/package/app-mobilephone/smssend
> 
> The site contains a link to ChangeLog, description, current version,
> forums and bugs. I would suggest it is the most usable homepage a user
> can expect if no other exists.
> 
++ This makes the most sense; it's simple and it enables users to interact
with the appropriate channels to get support, or file bugs and patches.

If a notice is needed, the website can be amended to state explicitly that
upstream is dead (if the homepage points to self.)