From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-32327-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1KSWFb-0000aa-GI
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 11 Aug 2008 12:11:51 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 79FD8E10B6;
Mon, 11 Aug 2008 12:10:03 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F50EE0E29
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 11 Aug 2008 12:09:51 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60FD667DDA
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 11 Aug 2008 07:27:29 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org
X-Spam-Score: -0.152
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.152 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-0.109,
BAYES_05=-1.11, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO=2.067]
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id IeB+214TsSrA for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>;
Mon, 11 Aug 2008 07:27:22 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2])
(using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE2EA67DCE
for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Mon, 11 Aug 2008 07:27:21 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43)
id 1KSRo7-0004CV-Mw
for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Mon, 11 Aug 2008 07:27:11 +0000
Received: from 91.85.186.135 ([91.85.186.135])
by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Mon, 11 Aug 2008 07:27:11 +0000
Received: from slong by 91.85.186.135 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Mon, 11 Aug 2008 07:27:11 +0000
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
From: Steve Long <slong@rathaus.eclipse.co.uk>
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Retirement
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 08:25:54 +0100
Message-ID: <g7opk4$7ho$1@ger.gmane.org>
References: <200808110027.04169.zlin@gentoo.org>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 91.85.186.135
User-Agent: KNode/0.10.9
Sender: news <news@ger.gmane.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Archives-Salt: 49c4942d-862b-4264-ab6f-7af7a43c2435
X-Archives-Hash: 6a3722f08ccc1c310342e952f436d4d3
Bo =D8rsted Andresen wrote:
> My retirement is probably long overdue as I haven't really been active =
for
> several months. It is now clear to me that Gentoo is not moving in the
> direction I had wished for and the last council election indicates that
> most current Gentoo developers appear to be satisfied with this current
> direction. Therefore farewell. If anybody wants to reach me I can be
> reached at bo.andresen at zlin.dk.
>=20
Sorry to see you go. It's a shame if the technical direction is what you
mean, since Gentoo can clearly accomodate different approaches to the sam=
e
problem (it is source-based after all.)
One thing: the door isn't nailed shut, even if new ones are opening ;-) H=
ope
to see you back iow.