From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1K9b9I-0001Zf-2g for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 20 Jun 2008 07:35:08 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7604DE0329; Fri, 20 Jun 2008 07:35:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48A40E0329 for ; Fri, 20 Jun 2008 07:35:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBF6F6783D for ; Fri, 20 Jun 2008 07:35:05 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -1.145 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.145 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=0.387, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO=2.067] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Wr5kj0wGGPzg for ; Fri, 20 Jun 2008 07:34:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC2816784B for ; Fri, 20 Jun 2008 07:34:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1K9b90-0007Rk-H1 for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Fri, 20 Jun 2008 07:34:50 +0000 Received: from 212.126.163.234 ([212.126.163.234]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 20 Jun 2008 07:34:50 +0000 Received: from dev-zero by 212.126.163.234 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 20 Jun 2008 07:34:50 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Tiziano =?ISO-8859-1?Q?M=FCller?= Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: What to do when Python 2.5 is blocking your package from entering stable? (Agenda for next council meeting?) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 09:34:38 +0200 Organization: Gentoo Message-ID: References: <20080620080038.2442aa92@gentoo.org> <485B481A.6090004@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 212.126.163.234 User-Agent: KNode/0.10.9 Sender: news X-Archives-Salt: c010577a-de44-4723-a7d8-da28ffb86281 X-Archives-Hash: 2458068213f30f0efe6e296c9f63fff5 Rob Cakebread wrote: > Samuli Suominen wrote: >> I don't know about you, but when a package can't be stabled because >> it's depending on Python 2.5 and current stable is broken I'd like >> to start reverting stable keywords back to ~arch as noone wants to >> maintain broken junk. Latest being app-cdr/gtkcdlabel, and >> media-video/gaupol. Perhaps it should be a council agenda? >> >> Not much different from "slacking arches", it's simple, lack of >> active devs. What I would prefer, of course, is a list from one of >> python members to get it into stable but have no expetations, since >> I've asked it many times past 1-2 years. > > Unless there are any objections from the rest of the Python project, > I'll try to get this done within the next 24 hours. I think it's good to go. -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list