From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NzBS5-0003pa-Mb for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 16:16:33 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7BF4DE0B1A; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 16:16:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41D8AE0B0E for ; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 16:16:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E75411B40C8 for ; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 16:16:23 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -1.998 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=0.601, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I44rD26dalIW for ; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 16:16:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ew0-f214.google.com (mail-ew0-f214.google.com [209.85.219.214]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C51667F32 for ; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 16:16:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy6 with SMTP id 6so32835ewy.12 for ; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 09:16:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:received:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=v4UsHA9zenFO0aegFwxX4tUPEU8DqIx0B0GyoJOx6Rs=; b=krHcJzrJlznA2cH2ljLC9sIv/P8J20AnYgzmlaphkDvmFaDWaD1BAqfASBxuRCA/9S lB1pFW2g8nJFKQEW9AcLRamd0uBF41q+ZkPxsg8wA0PQgbIWef80xhhRzw9OIbxrTxDP DDCktwmf6syvysNjzZ1y6LtUmcr8iKcQwMXM4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=e+XazrUx+X2351DwTU3o79QuZ2yZQ+gfbgJuFyvZEkUzLLDbukhp3Vvd7lFoLybeiQ Yey1kjbVD9AVQ5TE8W1G6ZpmpdqDThKNBLN6XpxDj1ziZPicdwcOuxFbuSyJuXw3SF3A Bt6s2X1f7DJUyT++OZ6L104+yFlX6Q7c08nsI= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: denis.dupeyron@gmail.com Received: by 10.213.108.71 with HTTP; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 09:16:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4BB93E00.3070301@gentoo.org> <4BB97A39.20500@caf.com.tr> <20100405160701.GA15345@eris.oppresses.us> <20100405182552.GE2156@Caemlyn.Fullrate> <4BBA9994.1020301@gentoo.org> Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 10:16:13 -0600 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 15d88d6dbb76eed2 Received: by 10.213.75.134 with SMTP id y6mr4256402ebj.78.1270570573955; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 09:16:13 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [Gentoo Phoenix] recruitment process From: Denis Dupeyron To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: f53b7dca-27ef-4b66-b5ab-60159839384b X-Archives-Hash: 29a68d9cb3bebbcc08a1e5c409eb070a On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 7:28 AM, Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> wrote: > But while I don't do IRC, from various hints I've seen here, that hasn't > necessarily been the case there. =A0I'm not making a judgement of whether > that's good or bad and am only going on various asides I've seen here > because as I said, I don't do IRC, but that's the impression I've gotten. There's something to be said about not trusting hearsay, and also about not talking about something you haven't witnessed yourself. In other words it looks like you might have wasted an opportunity to shut up. Denis.