From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-31372-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1K6hMb-0006eb-DR
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 12 Jun 2008 07:36:53 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B210CE04F1;
Thu, 12 Jun 2008 07:36:51 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B195E04F1
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 12 Jun 2008 07:36:51 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23FD867519
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 12 Jun 2008 07:36:51 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org
X-Spam-Score: -1.927
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.927 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=0.672,
BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id acImdM7UzPu7 for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>;
Thu, 12 Jun 2008 07:36:43 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2])
(using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 088EF64B5A
for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Thu, 12 Jun 2008 07:36:40 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43)
id 1K6hMJ-0005Kf-5B
for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Thu, 12 Jun 2008 07:36:35 +0000
Received: from e176125164.adsl.alicedsl.de ([85.176.125.164])
by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Thu, 12 Jun 2008 07:36:35 +0000
Received: from jokey by e176125164.adsl.alicedsl.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Thu, 12 Jun 2008 07:36:35 +0000
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
From: Markus Ullmann <jokey@gentoo.org>
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Agenda [WAS: One-Day Gentoo Council Reminder for June]
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 09:36:18 +0200
Message-ID: <g2qjln$fji$1@ger.gmane.org>
References: <20080611070618.54E4066E24@smtp.gentoo.org> <20080611215827.GB7074@comet>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature";
boundary="------------enigEC0ED58C12C850E8823D6250"
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: e176125164.adsl.alicedsl.de
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; de; rv:1.8.1.14) Gecko/20080504 Thunderbird/2.0.0.14 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666
In-Reply-To: <20080611215827.GB7074@comet>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6
Sender: news <news@ger.gmane.org>
X-Archives-Salt: 00ecebd9-4ea6-4f97-ad4f-8bb225ba144f
X-Archives-Hash: 15eb5ba61e0d32267b5fff29d065b70f
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enigEC0ED58C12C850E8823D6250
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Donnie Berkholz schrieb:
>Status of PMS
>-------------
>ferringb said:
> I'd like the council to please discuss the current status of PMS, if
> the running of it satisfys the councils requirements of a *neutral*
> standard, if the proposed spec actually meets said standards, and if
> said spec is actually going to be approved sometimes this side of'09.=
>
>Preparation: Post your opinion to the -dev thread "One-Day Gentoo
>Council Reminder for June" 2+ hours before the meeting.
After investing more than two hours to just read the Mails that popped=20
up yesterday regarding this stuff, I'd say we can't really take this=20
serious. The PMS maintainers were withholding information on=20
compatibility issues they've seen.
As such we can't be sure this will pop up again in the future and so I=20
strongly suggest dismissing this as something official for gentoo.
Best Regards
Markus Ullmann
Gentoo Council Member
--------------enigEC0ED58C12C850E8823D6250
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAkhQ0fYACgkQz974XjDVpbl0pQCfc0y2hn1Hm8IYVtBt616jNCQn
wPoAoJTY9TOfOKcV1qDSj7rT+43XZGX9
=WlsD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--------------enigEC0ED58C12C850E8823D6250--
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list