public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jesus Rivero (Neurogeek)" <neurogeek@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [Gentoo Phoenix] recruitment process
Date: Sat, 3 Apr 2010 14:30:07 -0430	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <g2l1a0a15de1004031200tb41b24d9p72f4b4de16ef176b@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <j2he117dbb91004030640n171d6b3u959bd6fadf2190a2@mail.gmail.com>

Hi guys,

On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 9:10 AM, Ben de Groot <yngwin@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On 3 April 2010 13:33, Richard Freeman <rich0@gentoo.org> wrote:
>> I really think that the Gentoo recruitment process needs improvement. Right
>> now it seems like a LOT of effort is required both to become a Gentoo dev
>> and to help somebody become a Gentoo dev.  That means we have great people,
>> but not many of them.
>
> I agree. So what can we do to improve this process?
>
> I myself am not fond of the quizzes, and from what I've seen most
> recruits find them tedious as well. It can be quite demotivating,
> maybe because it reminds one too much of highschool or something.
> I took a long time myself to finish them, and that wouldn't have
> been necessary, as my mentors ensured me I was ready to become a
> dev. And I see the same thing happening with some of my own recruits.
> They can be ready, but  just find the quizzes a chore.
>

   I understand that quizzes serve a purpose and IMHO, are a good way
to face common issues when writing ebuilds. On the other hand, I
understand that quizzes are lengthy and could become a blocker in the
recruitment process (I have met at least two prospects drop out due to
the inability to finish them, being for lack of time to concentrate or
because they got bored by the chore.)

   Maybe if we could find the way to make the knowledge found in
quizzes be more "exciting" to new devs, then we could still have a
strong recruitment process without the burden of completing the
quizzes. So, what I propose is to transform the "quizzes" part of the
process into a list of tasks the prospect should complete in order to
gain the necessary ability to "pass". This ability could be measured
in points or just by task completed.

   Then it gets interesting for them and for us. Those tasks could be
to tackle problems from the quizzes but in real ebuilds (prepared by
us for this, much as when recruiters ask us to clean some ebuild) or
could be tasks created by teams to specifically address common issues
in their domain if the prospect is trying to join them or shows an
interest on helping this specific team.

> Of course this doesn't address the organizational side of things, so
> we need to come up with something else for that.

   This doesn't address them either. But I really don't think this is
the main issue that causes the problem :) So I guess these questions
could remain in one "easy" quiz.

> --
> Ben de Groot
> Gentoo Linux Qt project lead developer
>
>

  If I can be of any assistance in this, I'll gladly help.

--
Jesus Rivero (Neurogeek)
Gentoo Python Team



  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-04-03 19:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-04-03 13:40 [gentoo-dev] [Gentoo Phoenix] recruitment process Ben de Groot
2010-04-03 13:53 ` "Paweł Hajdan, Jr."
2010-04-05  2:36   ` Alistair Bush
2010-04-05  8:23     ` Petteri Räty
2010-04-03 13:53 ` George Prowse
2010-04-03 14:05   ` Petteri Räty
2010-04-03 14:22     ` George Prowse
2010-04-03 21:39     ` Sebastian Pipping
2010-04-03 14:03 ` Petteri Räty
2010-04-03 19:00 ` Jesus Rivero (Neurogeek) [this message]
2010-04-03 21:48   ` Sebastian Pipping
2010-04-04  9:43     ` Petteri Räty
2010-04-04 16:24       ` Ben de Groot
2010-04-04 15:16     ` basile
2010-04-11  7:52 ` [gentoo-dev] [Gentoo Phoenix] Team : Recruitment Process Markos Chandras
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-04-05  1:33 [gentoo-dev] [Gentoo Phoenix] recruitment process Tobias Heinlein
2010-04-05  5:50 ` Eray Aslan
2010-04-05 16:07   ` Jon Portnoy
2010-04-05 16:50     ` George Prowse
2010-04-05 17:57       ` Jon Portnoy
2010-04-05 18:28         ` Denis Dupeyron
2010-04-05 18:26     ` Zeerak Mustafa Waseem
2010-04-05 17:35       ` Petteri Räty
2010-04-06  2:16       ` Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
2010-04-05 18:51     ` Nathan Zachary
2010-04-05 18:59       ` Denis Dupeyron
2010-04-07 17:35       ` Markos Chandras
2010-04-05  7:48 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2010-04-05  8:19   ` Brian Harring
2010-04-05 13:38   ` Richard Freeman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=g2l1a0a15de1004031200tb41b24d9p72f4b4de16ef176b@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=neurogeek@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox