From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JmZzi-0005Bn-3y for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 17 Apr 2008 19:42:06 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3EF7EE0732; Thu, 17 Apr 2008 19:42:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A27DE0732 for ; Thu, 17 Apr 2008 19:42:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9F8B6617C for ; Thu, 17 Apr 2008 19:42:02 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -2.422 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.422 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=1.177, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dZ+FGYTwGtik for ; Thu, 17 Apr 2008 19:41:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BFD4670AC for ; Thu, 17 Apr 2008 19:41:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1JmZzN-0000Zs-Qs for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Thu, 17 Apr 2008 19:41:45 +0000 Received: from gw.ptr-80-238-131-106.customer.ch.netstream.com ([80.238.131.106]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 17 Apr 2008 19:41:45 +0000 Received: from dev-zero by gw.ptr-80-238-131-106.customer.ch.netstream.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 17 Apr 2008 19:41:45 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Tiziano =?ISO-8859-1?Q?M=FCller?= Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: PostgreSQL Status Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 23:36:30 +0200 Organization: Gentoo Message-ID: References: <4807115C.6090904@gentoo.org> <20080417164003.GB31409@nibiru.local> <8b4c83ad0804170952s5728a968v60f04f30a66e3a25@mail.gmail.com> <20080417170753.GE31409@nibiru.local> <8b4c83ad0804171029v2e37bb06i98431e96dce2876c@mail.gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: gw.ptr-80-238-131-106.customer.ch.netstream.com User-Agent: KNode/0.10.9 Sender: news X-Archives-Salt: 07f10b41-219e-4d46-8ff6-d0f9c1d2d6aa X-Archives-Hash: de71274177866ce648b190ed36253d93 Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: > I personally have no opinion about the -base and -server split, since > I do not know enough about it. But I am firmly against the -docs split > since the doc USE flag is for this use-case, and I see no reason why > not to use it. > > Just stick a USE=doc on -base and be done with it Well, this I can answer: The documentation installed by postgresql-docs consists of both server and base documentation. There's also a 'doc' USE-flag for postgresql-base which pulls in the docs. Besides this, the use case I wrote in one of my last messages for postgresql-base/-server also applies to postgresql-base/-docs or postgresql-server/-docs. -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list