From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-30335-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1JmQyK-0002nw-7B
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 17 Apr 2008 10:04:04 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A862AE0492;
Thu, 17 Apr 2008 10:04:02 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78BDDE0492
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 17 Apr 2008 10:04:02 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DAD966CF1
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 17 Apr 2008 10:04:02 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org
X-Spam-Score: -2.908
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.908 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=0.691,
BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 0CvVigm9IzqO for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>;
Thu, 17 Apr 2008 10:03:50 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2])
(using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1602064DA0
for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Thu, 17 Apr 2008 10:03:49 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43)
id 1JmQxx-0005Fc-Th
for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Thu, 17 Apr 2008 10:03:41 +0000
Received: from dhcp-206-31-vpn.unizh.ch ([130.60.206.31])
by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Thu, 17 Apr 2008 10:03:41 +0000
Received: from dev-zero by dhcp-206-31-vpn.unizh.ch with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Thu, 17 Apr 2008 10:03:41 +0000
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
From: Tiziano =?ISO-8859-1?Q?M=FCller?= <dev-zero@gentoo.org>
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: PostgreSQL Status
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 11:58:30 +0200
Organization: Gentoo
Message-ID: <fu779n$6pl$1@ger.gmane.org>
References: <fu4bdd$s1l$1@ger.gmane.org> <4807115C.6090904@gentoo.org>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: dhcp-206-31-vpn.unizh.ch
User-Agent: KNode/0.10.9
Sender: news <news@ger.gmane.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Archives-Salt: 10126d9c-b0c3-459d-98bc-221c15f05efc
X-Archives-Hash: aab75054ddd9dbf1cce56cd38f05215d
Luca Barbato wrote:
> Tiziano M=FCller wrote:
>> What do the new ebuilds offer:
>> a) A split into dev-db/postgresql-{base,server,docs}.
>=20
> WRONG we aren't debian.
This is why we decided not to split out headers, clients and contrib.
>=20
>> Now, I know that
>> splitting up packages isn't the Gentoo way. I know we could have done =
it
>> using USE flags but this approach gives more flexibility due to the
>> current way how binary packages are being generated and distributed.
>=20
> It gives an annoyance please reconsider.
Done that. Won't change. See my answer to dberkholz's message.
--=20
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list