From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JmQyK-0002nw-7B for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 17 Apr 2008 10:04:04 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A862AE0492; Thu, 17 Apr 2008 10:04:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78BDDE0492 for ; Thu, 17 Apr 2008 10:04:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DAD966CF1 for ; Thu, 17 Apr 2008 10:04:02 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -2.908 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.908 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=0.691, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0CvVigm9IzqO for ; Thu, 17 Apr 2008 10:03:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1602064DA0 for ; Thu, 17 Apr 2008 10:03:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1JmQxx-0005Fc-Th for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Thu, 17 Apr 2008 10:03:41 +0000 Received: from dhcp-206-31-vpn.unizh.ch ([130.60.206.31]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 17 Apr 2008 10:03:41 +0000 Received: from dev-zero by dhcp-206-31-vpn.unizh.ch with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 17 Apr 2008 10:03:41 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Tiziano =?ISO-8859-1?Q?M=FCller?= Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: PostgreSQL Status Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 11:58:30 +0200 Organization: Gentoo Message-ID: References: <4807115C.6090904@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: dhcp-206-31-vpn.unizh.ch User-Agent: KNode/0.10.9 Sender: news Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 10126d9c-b0c3-459d-98bc-221c15f05efc X-Archives-Hash: aab75054ddd9dbf1cce56cd38f05215d Luca Barbato wrote: > Tiziano M=FCller wrote: >> What do the new ebuilds offer: >> a) A split into dev-db/postgresql-{base,server,docs}. >=20 > WRONG we aren't debian. This is why we decided not to split out headers, clients and contrib. >=20 >> Now, I know that >> splitting up packages isn't the Gentoo way. I know we could have done = it >> using USE flags but this approach gives more flexibility due to the >> current way how binary packages are being generated and distributed. >=20 > It gives an annoyance please reconsider. Done that. Won't change. See my answer to dberkholz's message. --=20 gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list