Santiago M. Mola wrote: > A lot of users don't feel comfortable using Bugzilla and often are > lost with our procedures for keyword (both ~ and stable) requests. I > think we could use an easy web interface for requesting specific > keywords for packages in a point-and-click fashion. Speaking about Bugzilla in general, I think ours could really use a facelift. When you look at what some other projects have done to make their bug reporting and tracking interface more user-friendly, it's obvious we have a lot of room for improvement. I remember back when I first started using Gentoo seeing a mock-up some dev had done for a bugzilla redesign that was much simpler and visually appealing, but I can't remember who and I suppose they've probably retired since. I've always thought it was a shame it never saw implementation. Anyways, I think this could make a good project for someone in our community who would like to participate but perhaps is more artistic than technical. Previous web design work and a good understanding of user interface design would be required of course. I suppose we should probably ask infra if this is possible first too. ;) On keywording/stabilizing, Bugzilla has a flags feature that might be used to track what has been tested where. For example: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12345 Flags have three states: +, -, and ?. + and - are obvious, and ? is a request. So imagine having a "x86 tested" flag that the maintainer sets to "?" to request stabilization of their package. An email is sent to the arch alias notifying them of the request. The arch tester tests it out and sets the flag to + or - depending on their results. The arch dev stabilizes the package as normal. If we added a "Keyword/Stable Request" component to the "Gentoo Linux" product we could also have it dependent on that, so only bugs in that component would display the flags. We can also make it so only people with editbugs privileges and request or set flags. http://www.bugzilla.org/docs/2.22/html/flags-overview.html Again, this would require infra to be on board. -- fonts, by design, by neglect gcc-porting, for a fact or just for effect wxwindows @ gentoo EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662