From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JTrY2-0004Ms-Sk for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 04:36:11 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 51BF4E03D3; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 04:36:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 243DCE03D3 for ; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 04:36:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89D68670C5 for ; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 04:36:07 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -1.125 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.125 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-0.015, BAYES_05=-1.11] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qVHfq+VjGyYL for ; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 04:35:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DD1667057 for ; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 04:31:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1JTrTC-0008Ec-Va for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 04:31:10 +0000 Received: from static24-72-115-196.yorkton.accesscomm.ca ([24.72.115.196]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 04:31:10 +0000 Received: from dirtyepic by static24-72-115-196.yorkton.accesscomm.ca with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 04:31:10 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Ryan Hill Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: net-misc/zsync destiny? Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 22:30:25 -0600 Message-ID: References: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig13B175C9B059DC3E12F0A9A0" X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: static24-72-115-196.yorkton.accesscomm.ca User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20080213 Thunderbird/2.0.0.9 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0 In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 OpenPGP: id=F9A40662; url=subkeys.pgp.net Sender: news X-Archives-Salt: 175667dc-088f-4738-9db4-dd545eeb9e21 X-Archives-Hash: 4fd880e83f46fd9b1c77fb25813afc17 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig13B175C9B059DC3E12F0A9A0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Diego 'Flameeyes' Petten=C3=B2 wrote: > I was just looking around in package.mask to see if I forgot to get rid= > of something, and I've noticed that zsync is currently masked because i= t > contains an internal _vulnerable_ copy of zlib. >=20 > It is currently maintainer-needed, so I don't see anybody actually > fixing it to use system zlib anytime soon. >=20 > Any reason why it isn't simply lastrited unless someone wants to > maintain it? Treecleaners? https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D208660 --=20 fonts, by design, by neglect gcc-porting, for a fact or just for effect wxwindows @ gentoo EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662 --------------enig13B175C9B059DC3E12F0A9A0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHw5XpiqiDRvmkBmIRCP+FAKCGHaSRrmmUF9FJULdplO7/XjYTcgCfQI8I VHvFSKGpTj+onLeyWddVSMo= =+sfF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig13B175C9B059DC3E12F0A9A0-- -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list