From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JGDQI-0001xk-11 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 13:07:46 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E1B99E03D7; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 13:07:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE116E03D7 for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 13:07:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59A02655C9 for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 13:07:44 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -1.974 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.974 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=0.625, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id q6CeVtJ7p32i for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 13:07:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6601965624 for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 13:07:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1JGDQ4-0006KS-2S for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 13:07:32 +0000 Received: from gw.ptr-80-238-132-74.customer.ch.netstream.com ([80.238.132.74]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 13:07:32 +0000 Received: from dev-zero by gw.ptr-80-238-132-74.customer.ch.netstream.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 13:07:32 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Tiziano =?ISO-8859-1?Q?M=FCller?= Subject: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 46: Allow upstream tags in metadata.xml Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 14:07:06 +0100 Organization: Gentoo Message-ID: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: gw.ptr-80-238-132-74.customer.ch.netstream.com User-Agent: KNode/0.10.5 Sender: news X-Archives-Salt: 38b031f2-7946-4948-bcb4-78a91a5ddae3 X-Archives-Hash: fc26befe66e072f1bff928009e39686f Current state: "Deferred" Wanted state: "Accepted/Implemented" (at least by me) Open questions from last discussion (March 2006): - Is it possible/should it be possible to have more than one entry? - Is recording an upstream-status (active/inactive) a good idea? Possibilities: An element: {active/inactive} An attribute: ... - Is an additional element needed to link to upstream docs - Must the type of be controlled/listed/checked? My answers to this: - yes - yes. Remark: do we need to specify when upstream has to be marked as active/inactive or can we use our common sense ? - yes. - not yet. Can be defined later. Your oppinion? -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list