From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-29035-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1JGDQI-0001xk-11
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 13:07:46 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E1B99E03D7;
Sat, 19 Jan 2008 13:07:44 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE116E03D7
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 13:07:44 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59A02655C9
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 13:07:44 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org
X-Spam-Score: -1.974
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.974 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=0.625,
BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id q6CeVtJ7p32i for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>;
Sat, 19 Jan 2008 13:07:38 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2])
(using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6601965624
for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 13:07:37 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43)
id 1JGDQ4-0006KS-2S
for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 13:07:32 +0000
Received: from gw.ptr-80-238-132-74.customer.ch.netstream.com ([80.238.132.74])
by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 13:07:32 +0000
Received: from dev-zero by gw.ptr-80-238-132-74.customer.ch.netstream.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 13:07:32 +0000
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
From: Tiziano =?ISO-8859-1?Q?M=FCller?= <dev-zero@gentoo.org>
Subject: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 46: Allow upstream tags in metadata.xml
Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 14:07:06 +0100
Organization: Gentoo
Message-ID: <fmssmd$jat$1@ger.gmane.org>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: gw.ptr-80-238-132-74.customer.ch.netstream.com
User-Agent: KNode/0.10.5
Sender: news <news@ger.gmane.org>
X-Archives-Salt: 38b031f2-7946-4948-bcb4-78a91a5ddae3
X-Archives-Hash: fc26befe66e072f1bff928009e39686f
Current state: "Deferred"
Wanted state: "Accepted/Implemented" (at least by me)
Open questions from last discussion (March 2006):
- Is it possible/should it be possible to have more than one <maintainer>
entry?
- Is recording an upstream-status (active/inactive) a good idea?
Possibilities:
An element: <status>{active/inactive}</status>
An attribute: <maintainer status="{active/inactive}">...
- Is an additional <doc> element needed to link to upstream docs
- Must the type of <remote-id> be controlled/listed/checked?
My answers to this:
- yes
- yes. Remark: do we need to specify when upstream has to be marked as
active/inactive or can we use our common sense ?
- yes.
- not yet. Can be defined later.
Your oppinion?
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list