From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JFSK8-00019j-V5 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 10:50:17 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 17466E08F9; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 10:50:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4FB2E08F9 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 10:50:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E1B3659C0 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 10:50:14 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: 1.265 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.265 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-0.803, BAYES_50=0.001, RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO=2.067] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bTb5hKkt8zmF for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 10:50:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD5C4659EC for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 10:50:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1JFSJs-0002Jo-Tr for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 10:50:00 +0000 Received: from 82.153.79.105 ([82.153.79.105]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 10:50:00 +0000 Received: from slong by 82.153.79.105 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 10:50:00 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Steve Long Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Seeking questions for a user survey Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 10:56:36 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20080114123348.GH5504@curie-int.orbis-terrarum.net> <20080115150514.83634594.genone@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.153.79.105 User-Agent: KNode/0.10.4 Sender: news X-Archives-Salt: 9262cddc-bdad-4cb8-92c6-4bf4b984a520 X-Archives-Hash: bc03fdbeefd01886e0f308442e861e76 Ryan Hill wrote: > I agree, though year of birth might be interesting. Income and children > are a bit too private. > ++ in general although I do think parenthood (if responsible) is as relevant as age. A 28 year old with a 5 year old kid has a lot to show a 35 year old doctoral student with no kids, even if it's not all technical. # of kids isn't relevant. Maybe it's not something you want to ask the users, but it would be more interesting wrt devs, as would statistics on standard Equal Ops monitoring (a legal requirement on employers in the UK, even if the person declines to answer, which is ofc their right.) -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list