From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JAbIt-0006n7-0z for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 04 Jan 2008 01:24:55 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.2/8.14.0) with SMTP id m041O2FI028342; Fri, 4 Jan 2008 01:24:02 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.2/8.14.0) with ESMTP id m041M2ht026002 for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2008 01:22:03 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CE5165855 for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2008 01:22:02 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -0.522 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.522 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-0.523, BAYES_50=0.001] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Q4nAloydZ7nR for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2008 01:21:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD176656F2 for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2008 01:21:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1JAbFp-0001kH-Ja for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Fri, 04 Jan 2008 01:21:45 +0000 Received: from static24-72-113-196.yorkton.accesscomm.ca ([24.72.113.196]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 04 Jan 2008 01:21:45 +0000 Received: from dirtyepic by static24-72-113-196.yorkton.accesscomm.ca with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 04 Jan 2008 01:21:45 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Ryan Hill Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for January Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2008 19:21:39 -0600 Message-ID: References: <20080101103002.083C4652C4@smtp.gentoo.org> <54551.192.168.2.159.1199365359.squirrel@www.aei-tech.com> <477D75CA.1030003@gentoo.org> <20080104000155.23e056b4@snowcone> <20080104004653.039f488e@snowcone> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: static24-72-113-196.yorkton.accesscomm.ca User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071218) In-Reply-To: <20080104004653.039f488e@snowcone> Sender: news X-Archives-Salt: 738139a7-7f9f-4521-ab6e-d9f9579c5e2b X-Archives-Hash: 4e71485ec79fe17b247a47d8e92c4684 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Thu, 03 Jan 2008 18:40:43 -0600 > Ryan Hill wrote: >> I have four versions of freetype sitting around that I'd really like >> to get rid of > > And what is the cost of you not getting rid of them? Is there any > particular reason it matters when it's done? The general maintenance cost of any ebuild in the tree. If we want to make an external or global change in how the package is built or used, we have to make sure those changes work with all versions in the tree. -- fonts, by design, by neglect gcc-porting, for a fact or just for effect wxwindows @ gentoo EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662 -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list