From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1J1puU-0006Tj-6c for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 10 Dec 2007 21:11:30 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.2/8.14.0) with SMTP id lBAL9RiO016004; Mon, 10 Dec 2007 21:09:27 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.2/8.14.0) with ESMTP id lBAL6KFI011066 for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2007 21:06:20 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5B4065852 for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2007 21:06:19 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -0.675 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.675 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-0.676, BAYES_50=0.001] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XVmrxQJDvEvK for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2007 21:06:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 235AB64C41 for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2007 21:06:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1J1pp3-0002x4-O3 for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Mon, 10 Dec 2007 21:05:53 +0000 Received: from gw.ptr-80-238-132-74.customer.ch.netstream.com ([80.238.132.74]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2007 21:05:53 +0000 Received: from dev-zero by gw.ptr-80-238-132-74.customer.ch.netstream.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2007 21:05:53 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Tiziano =?ISO-8859-1?Q?M=FCller?= Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Kerberos Maintainence Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 22:04:28 +0100 Organization: Gentoo Message-ID: References: <475D502B.4030400@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: gw.ptr-80-238-132-74.customer.ch.netstream.com User-Agent: KNode/0.10.5 Sender: news X-Archives-Salt: 5f7c71f0-7065-451f-9eab-93bda898d96d X-Archives-Hash: 31d95c5ba0a41f40d1ccd99576bd2fd4 Doug Klima wrote: > Hello all, > > Currently our Heimdal packages and MIT-KRB5 packages are woefully out of > date. I know Seemant tried for a while and I have been trying to recruit > maintainers for these packages but completely unsuccessfully. So I turn > to the mailing list to hopefully recruit someone. I don't use Heimdal > enough to become the maintainer for it but I do have a bunch of user > contributed work (he's not interested in becoming a maintainer) that I > have reviewed partially that could be a start for any future maintainer. > Also, if you're not currently a Gentoo developer, I'll happily be your > mentor and help you become an official developer. > > Short version, we need a Heimdal and MIT-KRB5 maintainer. Preferably 2 > since Heimdal and MIT are different. I already started with testing heimdal-1.0.2RC6 with the patchset in the bug and I plan to commit it once it's ready. But I'm not sure how much time I can put into it since I have other package/herds/projects which need some love. But I'll do my best... Cheers, Tiziano -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list