From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IsWst-0007km-32 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 15 Nov 2007 05:03:23 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.2/8.14.0) with SMTP id lAF52WwJ020095; Thu, 15 Nov 2007 05:02:32 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.2/8.14.0) with ESMTP id lAF50ce9017778 for ; Thu, 15 Nov 2007 05:00:38 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1C11657E6 for ; Thu, 15 Nov 2007 05:00:37 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -0.526 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.526 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-0.527, BAYES_50=0.001] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HoXugtsLBu46 for ; Thu, 15 Nov 2007 05:00:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FEED65C09 for ; Thu, 15 Nov 2007 05:00:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1IsWoz-0006nX-4p for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Thu, 15 Nov 2007 04:59:21 +0000 Received: from static24-72-113-196.yorkton.accesscomm.ca ([24.72.113.196]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 15 Nov 2007 04:59:21 +0000 Received: from dirtyepic by static24-72-113-196.yorkton.accesscomm.ca with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 15 Nov 2007 04:59:21 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Ryan Hill Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: packages.gentoo.org lives! Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 22:57:04 -0600 Message-ID: References: <20071114025824.GB18361@curie-int.orbis-terrarum.net> <200711142128.14662.bonbons67@internet.lu> <20071115003218.GH18361@curie-int.orbis-terrarum.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigB02B34758E3DDD984D2B7FAF" X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: static24-72-113-196.yorkton.accesscomm.ca User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071027) In-Reply-To: <20071115003218.GH18361@curie-int.orbis-terrarum.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.5 OpenPGP: id=F9A40662; url=subkeys.pgp.net Sender: news X-Archives-Salt: c12bb76f-fc01-4457-b907-a4d7e49a74be X-Archives-Hash: 70277aa15e83a8bbeb658312d7978857 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigB02B34758E3DDD984D2B7FAF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Robin H. Johnson wrote: > Having small fonts isn't common, at least not amongst folk that I've > directly observed in usability testing. Having text at sizes that don't= > strain the eyes is more common. It doesn't seem unreasonable that the site be readable despite the font size. The logo overlaps the text at any point size under 16, at least in= my browser, which is quite big. My screenshot was with size 12, which is= what I use everywhere and I'm sure I'm not alone. I don't know anything about HTML but is it possible to set a minimum font size or force it to 1= 6? > CSS 'min-width' isn't usable, because it interferes with the rest of th= e > layout, and the folks with tiny fonts then have a massive gap between > their text, and the middle column. > What the actual solution is, is a narrower logo. I've been > asking and looking, but have not yet found, a version of the logo > without the spotlight effect on the background. Moving the text in the middle column down so it begins under the logo would also work, wouldn't it? All of our other pages (except b.g.o) have either the plain purple banner or black banner with links across the top, and it works fine there. Is there some reason it can't be done here also? --=20 looks like christmas at fifty-five degrees this latitude weakens my knees EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662 (0xF9A40662) --------------enigB02B34758E3DDD984D2B7FAF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHO9GgiqiDRvmkBmIRCPuqAKDTCS3T9Znlm6V1dAj43e2ndfCBTQCdGBeh s7vRE12WMnnrh2eNlpXybFQ= =YfWL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigB02B34758E3DDD984D2B7FAF-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list