From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1ImiKP-0007zv-Hz for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 30 Oct 2007 04:03:45 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.1/8.14.0) with SMTP id l9U42H7L023400; Tue, 30 Oct 2007 04:02:17 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.1/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l9U3vmq1014261 for ; Tue, 30 Oct 2007 03:57:49 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A431C65660 for ; Tue, 30 Oct 2007 03:57:48 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -0.299 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.299 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=0.233, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO=2.067] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jjb5iE779sLk for ; Tue, 30 Oct 2007 03:57:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFD446565E for ; Tue, 30 Oct 2007 03:57:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from root by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1ImiBy-0003s2-KO for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Tue, 30 Oct 2007 03:55:02 +0000 Received: from 82.152.223.124 ([82.152.223.124]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 30 Oct 2007 03:55:02 +0000 Received: from slong by 82.152.223.124 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 30 Oct 2007 03:55:02 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Steve Long Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Opinions Wanted - Arrays again :) Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 03:58:08 +0000 Message-ID: References: <1193326831.4245.16.camel@uberlaptop.marples.name> <1193651410.4244.14.camel@uberlaptop.marples.name> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.152.223.124 User-Agent: KNode/0.10.4 Sender: news X-Archives-Salt: 454be6a7-4a16-4a13-93f2-fac60defda9d X-Archives-Hash: 569d681bd48b103ff68dc575a62ff199 Roy Marples wrote: > I've not opted for another config format (either based on Debians or > something else) as this doesn't rock the baselayout-2 boat that much as > it's a fairly trivial patch. Once we have baselayout-2 stable then we > can think about revisiting this for future versions if there is still a > need. > Oops, missed this: ignore my other post please, list, and apologies (although I'd be happy to help with the stuff discussed; i'll catch you on IRC, Roy.) -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list