From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HkRkU-0000et-5R for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 05 May 2007 21:25:02 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l45LNScP031390; Sat, 5 May 2007 21:23:28 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l45LJpWV025989 for ; Sat, 5 May 2007 21:19:52 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85A8764DF8 for ; Sat, 5 May 2007 21:19:51 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -1.03 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.03 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-1.030] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Z20r-ihk8SY7 for ; Sat, 5 May 2007 21:19:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD9D364549 for ; Sat, 5 May 2007 21:19:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1HkRfP-0006LN-C5 for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Sat, 05 May 2007 23:19:47 +0200 Received: from ip68-11-47-209.no.no.cox.net ([68.11.47.209]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 05 May 2007 23:19:47 +0200 Received: from boxcars by ip68-11-47-209.no.no.cox.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 05 May 2007 23:19:47 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=BBQ=AB?= Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: [news-item] Paludis 0.24 Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 16:10:39 -0500 Organization: none Message-ID: References: <200705042249.48267.peper@gentoo.org> <463CEB11.7030307@gentoo.org> <20070505214435.2358b2ed@snowflake> <200705052250.26106.expose@luftgetrock.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip68-11-47-209.no.no.cox.net X-Newsreader: Claws Mail 2.8.1 (GTK+ 2.10.9; i686-pc-linux-gnu) X-Face: *#`F(_&o,GRH~~$V&ByU1LZAWc]JgxuT`Pv2y0`&JE`(=*PcC>#m2]xv]p,i|9mDJ+8dGMJl`V[!z]\N}qrLTHjU]Sew>rQBShT_8.(0Q(iH,Gu7k|y/)^!@oVydVrix*#|-|u2~zgA'U3nQ_fa#jXvcGL[9f:>8?U=hXYK3D~*}Gq$TjPe1WXEFLGTiB3ot!oMH"'(Jop0(\0C X-No-Archive: yes Sender: news Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by robin.gentoo.org id l45LNSeM031390 X-Archives-Salt: 6d98b804-e50a-44ec-a67e-76f204db3049 X-Archives-Hash: 07ae4aec665768a7031eff2219ae09bf In , expose@luftgetrock.net wrote: > I bet there are other users around, who think a config file format > change that doesnt break anything but produce warnings in the first > place is non-critical. I'm another one. I guess someone needs to decide whether the criterion is 'critical' or 'important'; there seems to be confusion about the intent and wording of GLEP 42. --=20 =BBQ=AB --=20 gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list