From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IhbQP-0004Gp-Hu for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 01:40:50 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.1/8.14.0) with SMTP id l9G1T6aI015953; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 01:29:06 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.1/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l9G1PraT011249 for ; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 01:25:53 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27F436562C for ; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 01:25:53 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -1.815 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.815 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=0.784, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pVUYzQCL3f-j for ; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 01:25:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B45E64D5F for ; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 01:25:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Ihb7R-00025D-PD for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 01:21:13 +0000 Received: from static24-72-113-196.yorkton.accesscomm.ca ([24.72.113.196]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 01:21:13 +0000 Received: from dirtyepic by static24-72-113-196.yorkton.accesscomm.ca with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 01:21:13 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Ryan Hill Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in media-tv/mythtv: ChangeLog mythtv-0.20.2_p14668.ebuild mythtv-0.21_pre14666.ebuild mythtv-0.21_pre14480-r1.ebuild Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 19:17:25 -0600 Message-ID: References: <20071013004453.GM23990@supernova> <4711974B.6010505@gentoo.org> <20071014045010.GS23990@supernova> <47137651.8040503@gentoo.org> <47137849.7030608@utas.edu.au> <47137B11.1070003@gentoo.org> <4713D43A.9080107@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: static24-72-113-196.yorkton.accesscomm.ca User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070923) In-Reply-To: <4713D43A.9080107@gentoo.org> Sender: news X-Archives-Salt: 9f2f71ef-b7cf-4953-8ed1-31a78f3e646d X-Archives-Hash: 10664a412b161aff351b2582f3d07851 Doug Goldstein wrote: > I still stand by my original feeling that we'd better the community NOT > only the developers doing the commits by updating the devmanual, which > is accessible to all developers and all users in the Gentoo community. This would be a great thing, but I'm under the impression that it's somewhat difficult to get changes made to the devmanual for various reasons. That said I've never actually tried so I'm probably talking out my ass. > The commits review is flawed because if we're not documenting this stuff > in one central place, then when new developers join. The same lessons > have to be learned over and over again. I think the review work is already very useful. However I do agree that actually documenting this stuff would be even more useful. > Then again, this depends on the QA guys actually doing something about > the outstanding bugs. This would not be the least of the various reasons. ;P -- fonts / wxWindows / gcc-porting / treecleaners EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662 (0xF9A40662) -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list