public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Arttu V." <arttuv69@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] emerge -C eselect-python disaster
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 13:29:01 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <fecdbac61001240329i1260bf38h1ec54220adbfeace@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100124061239.182027axa254v2kn@mail.junc.org>

On 1/24/10, Benny Pedersen <me@junc.org> wrote:
>
> should not be marked as system ?
>
> it removes python-wrapper and this remove python link from
> /usr/bin/python linked to /usr/bin/python-wrapper so all portage does
> not work after this, but i solved it with a quickpkg from another host
>
> my dump question why is it not listed as a system pkg when it really
> seems so important ?

Nearly identical question was mulled over in a discussion last spring
over at gentoo-user list. Scan for "ARGH I uninstalled python" in the
archives if you are interested.

IIRC there was a suggestion to make the system set dynamically grow to
contain all of the required dependencies of the packages explicitly
listed in the system set, but I'm not sure if it went anywhere.

Anyways, the current contents of @system cause all kinds of surprises,
for example to FEATURES="buildsyspkg" users who rely on the feature
without realizing how small (and even "incomplete") @system actually
is.

-- 
Arttu V.



  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-01-24 12:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-01-24  5:12 [gentoo-dev] emerge -C eselect-python disaster Benny Pedersen
2010-01-24  9:03 ` Ulrich Mueller
2010-01-24  9:40 ` Petteri Räty
2010-01-24 11:07 ` Petteri Räty
2010-01-24 13:02   ` Ben de Groot
2010-01-24 16:53     ` Petteri Räty
2010-01-24 18:20       ` Ben de Groot
2010-01-24 20:19         ` Petteri Räty
2010-01-25  0:02           ` Dale
2010-01-25  1:53             ` Jacob Godserv
2010-01-25  2:28               ` Dale
2010-01-25  9:26                 ` Petteri Räty
2010-01-25 11:02                   ` Dale
2010-01-25 11:30                     ` Petteri Räty
2010-01-25 11:32                       ` Petteri Räty
2010-01-25 16:06                         ` Dale
2010-01-25 17:04                           ` Petteri Räty
2010-01-26  1:26                           ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2010-01-25 16:20                         ` [gentoo-dev] " Jacob Godserv
2010-01-25 17:02                           ` Petteri Räty
2010-01-25 17:07                             ` Dale
2010-01-25 18:01                               ` Petteri Räty
2010-01-25 16:21                     ` Patrick Nagel
2010-01-25  2:22             ` Richard Freeman
2010-01-25  5:03               ` Dale
2010-01-25  9:25             ` Petteri Räty
2010-01-24 23:06         ` Richard Freeman
2010-01-24 11:29 ` Arttu V. [this message]
2010-01-24 13:03   ` Dale
2010-01-24 21:15 ` Mike Frysinger
2010-01-25 11:10   ` Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=fecdbac61001240329i1260bf38h1ec54220adbfeace@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=arttuv69@gmail.com \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox