From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ia0LZ-0003t8-UB for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 25 Sep 2007 02:40:26 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.1/8.14.0) with SMTP id l8P2VFLL028251; Tue, 25 Sep 2007 02:31:15 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.1/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l8P2TD4X025809 for ; Tue, 25 Sep 2007 02:29:14 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2067C654A2 for ; Tue, 25 Sep 2007 02:29:13 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -1.033 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.033 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=0.077, BAYES_05=-1.11] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id D+NC4zP6XqDV for ; Tue, 25 Sep 2007 02:29:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79FDA653D2 for ; Tue, 25 Sep 2007 02:29:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Ia03V-0008Um-R1 for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Tue, 25 Sep 2007 02:21:45 +0000 Received: from static24-72-113-196.yorkton.accesscomm.ca ([24.72.113.196]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 25 Sep 2007 02:21:45 +0000 Received: from dirtyepic by static24-72-113-196.yorkton.accesscomm.ca with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 25 Sep 2007 02:21:45 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Ryan Hill Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in sys-fs/udev: ChangeLog udev-115-r6.ebuild Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 20:19:34 -0600 Message-ID: References: <20070924200956.GS22279@supernova> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: static24-72-113-196.yorkton.accesscomm.ca User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070923) In-Reply-To: Sender: news X-Archives-Salt: da2f9b8e-96c3-4643-b8e9-935665f27da6 X-Archives-Hash: 74677879390d4fba5741685d1e0a9672 Duncan wrote: > Donnie Berkholz posted > 20070924200956.GS22279@supernova, excerpted below, on Mon, 24 Sep 2007 > 13:09:57 -0700: > >> For tests, pick a style >> [[ ]] or [ ] and stick with it. The [[ ]] one is pretty nice because it >> generally doesn't require quotes, so the code looks a lot cleaner. > > Can you point me (and anyone else that may be interested) to a nice > explanation of the difference? I've always wondered why [[ ]] is > considered "better" than [ ] for tests. check out http://tldp.org/LDP/abs/html/testconstructs.html#DBLBRACKETS -- fonts / wxWindows / gcc-porting / treecleaners 9B81 6C9F E791 83BB 3AB3 5B2D E625 A073 8379 37E8 (0x837937E8) -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list