From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62)
(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-23133-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@gentoo.org>)
id 1HhQAp-0003Gu-1t
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 13:07:43 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l3RD71pK024536;
Fri, 27 Apr 2007 13:07:01 GMT
Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com (nz-out-0506.google.com [64.233.162.229])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l3RD4giS021628
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 13:04:43 GMT
Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 12so1103871nzp
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 06:04:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=beta;
h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
b=rORypwbMmvEOLG4CMNtM9I9m+7pWOEuIc1V8ejt+vMiNYzq0RRbIMRtbx3TfsUSxUJPv7JNuH3hstToI98Qo391a/34ibb5kPFOnJrlRrbPqcj4xkKyeucECUiWnuzWkUVvyjy2dAxUdODIvyNJ7MyCEbTImis+oWQKQ0KnYLyU=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=beta;
h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
b=NcLOlvGy9uE4Nfaa2c6+vS9aZnsKu8IhWq6OLXJi3gotGAbTbhMuTfk6PVEAvULj6u7paP84SVXevO3hu/kDFydpA6BsHlFx/zq7KEvhIUtNlgtCaAuFAp92Z2foQJ00+ql3eVgnFk02QwRzEN13vf3pfJ7tt6YauqIgqKV2bEQ=
Received: by 10.114.15.1 with SMTP id 1mr971587wao.1177679081014;
Fri, 27 Apr 2007 06:04:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.114.74.6 with HTTP; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 06:04:40 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <fcaeb9bf0704270604p6d6fcdc9ga685209f51e14e1b@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 09:04:40 -0400
From: "Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy" <pclouds@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Planning for automatic assignment of bugs
In-Reply-To: <46311AE3.70600@gentoo.org>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <20070426194006.GP7846@curie-int.orbis-terrarum.net>
<fcaeb9bf0704261424m618c80b2ua2a91d892175c82e@mail.gmail.com>
<46311AE3.70600@gentoo.org>
X-Archives-Salt: cf51702f-103b-4511-b190-dc6b491e9ece
X-Archives-Hash: 85e86800079dbf07c5ba32fe62128666
On 4/26/07, Joshua Jackson <tsunam@gentoo.org> wrote:
> Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy wrote:
> > On 4/26/07, Robin H. Johnson <robbat2@gentoo.org> wrote:
> >> Case 2 - Metadata contains a single maintainer
> >> ----------------------------------------------
> >> - The herd field is not used.
> >> - The maintainer address is used as the bugzilla assignee.
> >> This is important for all the herds that have aliases that are NOT the
> >> same as their herd name!
> >> This diverges from existing manual practice, to avoid unnecessary
> >> duplicate mail, and means that existing metadata may need a cleanup.
> >
> > It should take devaway into account.
> >
> why? Seriously, dev-away != dev retired... having it take devaway into
> account is pointless in my opinion as it won't improve it being properly
> assigned...as it'll be covered in other cases, and its not like there's
> not bugs for all of us dev's that have not sat there for a month or so,
> at some point
I meant if a maintainer is away, his/her herd should be assignee with
him/her CCed.
--
Duy
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list