Re: [gentoo-dev] Planning for automatic assignment of bugs

["Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy" <pclouds@gmail.com>]

On 4/26/07, Joshua Jackson <tsunam@gentoo.org> wrote:
> Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy wrote:
> > On 4/26/07, Robin H. Johnson <robbat2@gentoo.org> wrote:
> >> Case 2 - Metadata contains a single maintainer
> >> ----------------------------------------------
> >> - The herd field is not used.
> >> - The maintainer address is used as the bugzilla assignee.
> >> This is important for all the herds that have aliases that are NOT the
> >> same as their herd name!
> >> This diverges from existing manual practice, to avoid unnecessary
> >> duplicate mail, and means that existing metadata may need a cleanup.
> >
> > It should take devaway into account.
> >
> why? Seriously, dev-away != dev retired... having it take devaway into
> account is pointless in my opinion as it won't improve it being properly
> assigned...as it'll be covered in other cases, and its not like there's
> not bugs for all of us dev's that have not sat there for a month or so,
> at some point

I meant if a maintainer is away, his/her herd should be assignee with
him/her CCed.

-- 
Duy
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list