From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IRqYi-0004lC-4b for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 02 Sep 2007 14:36:16 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l82ESw0T020281; Sun, 2 Sep 2007 14:28:58 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l82ER5Z8018079 for ; Sun, 2 Sep 2007 14:27:05 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A670F65F27 for ; Sun, 2 Sep 2007 14:27:04 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: 0.683 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.683 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-0.818, BAYES_50=0.001, RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO=1.5] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n23-WpCGXoJR for ; Sun, 2 Sep 2007 14:27:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97D0F65F26 for ; Sun, 2 Sep 2007 14:26:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1IRqPf-0003sO-S3 for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Sun, 02 Sep 2007 16:26:55 +0200 Received: from 82.152.211.157 ([82.152.211.157]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 02 Sep 2007 16:26:55 +0200 Received: from slong by 82.152.211.157 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 02 Sep 2007 16:26:55 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Steve Long Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: baselayout-2 & LVM Date: Sun, 02 Sep 2007 15:29:41 +0100 Message-ID: References: <46D7C0DD.9080102@wildgooses.com> <200708310948.53457.phreak@gentoo.org> <46D7F9B7.8010906@wildgooses.com> <200708311448.41029.zzam@gentoo.org> <46DABD52.9010702@wildgooses.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.152.211.157 User-Agent: KNode/0.10.4 Sender: news X-Archives-Salt: d03d4608-efe3-4f14-b8ce-0a268c88eec2 X-Archives-Hash: 3b835a02d1a725d6c0726a373cecafd3 Ed W wrote: >> For lvm2 this was added without increasing the ebuild revision, but later >> there were some updates of lvm2, so all users of ~arch that are up to >> date should have this. >> > Anyway, yes, installing that newer lvm2 fixed the problems. Probably > worth a note somewhere in the upgrade docs anyway > Definitely IMO, although the blocker would be much simpler. On a related note, is it ok for a later version of a package to block an earlier incarnation? (You know where I'm going with this, right?) -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list