> Asking people to check 8 checkboxes is a bit much.

yea... I would pick 2. and 4. from that and put them in 1 point.
So it could be:
 > [ ] I have tested that the package(s) merge inside both the user AND 
net sandbox without violations on a Gentoo-based system. also, if manual 
intervention (beyond "emerge PKG") is required to complete the 
install/update of the package(s) (and such functinality is or can not be 
done in pkg_configure/pkg_postinst/pkg_postrm) I have explained the 
steps needed to be taken in the PR and/or package ebuild(s).

(Eli,) The "[...] Gentoo Wiki" part was when we have one page for all 
knowledge about maintaining some grouped components, like for example 
new compiler porting or .NET pkg maintenance.

W dniu 1.05.2024 o 16:59, Michał Górny pisze:
> On Wed, 2024-05-01 at 16:27 +0200, Maciej Barć wrote:
>> Maybe we could consider also adding something along the lines (4
>> additional positions):
>>
>> 1. I have emerged the package(s) on a Gentoo-based system (be it
>> "native" or virtualized by means of hardware-based virtualization or
>> system layer virtualization).
>> 2. I have tested that the package(s) merge inside both the user and net
>> sandbox without violations on a Gentoo-based system.
>> 3. I can assure that the packages would be able to be merged on the
>> currently default Gentoo profile (with or without modifications to USE
>> flags).
>> 4. If manual intervention (beyond "emerge PKG") is required ro complete
>> the install/update of the package(s) I have explained the steps needed
>> to be taken in the PR and/or package ebuild(s) and/or Gentoo Wiki.
>>
> 
> Asking people to check 8 checkboxes is a bit much.
> 

-- 
Have a great day!

~ Maciej XGQT Barć

https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/User:Xgqt
9B0A 4C5D 02A3 B43C 9D6F D6B1 14D7 4A1F 43A6 AC3C