Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 2/7] eclass/dotnet-pkg-utils.eclass: introduce new eclass

["Maciej Barć" <xgqt@gentoo.org>]

W dniu 30.07.2023 o 21:34, Michał Górny pisze:
> On Sun, 2023-07-30 at 16:26 +0200, Maciej Barć wrote:
>> Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/900597
>> Bug: https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/29309
>> Signed-off-by: Maciej Barć <xgqt@gentoo.org>
>> ---
>>   eclass/dotnet-pkg-utils.eclass | 602 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 602 insertions(+)
>>   create mode 100644 eclass/dotnet-pkg-utils.eclass
>>
>> diff --git a/eclass/dotnet-pkg-utils.eclass b/eclass/dotnet-pkg-utils.eclass
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000..bdde11fe5
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/eclass/dotnet-pkg-utils.eclass
>> @@ -0,0 +1,602 @@
>> +# Copyright 1999-2023 Gentoo Authors
>> +# Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2
>> +
>> +# @ECLASS: dotnet-pkg-utils.eclass
>> +# @MAINTAINER:
>> +# Gentoo Dotnet project <dotnet@gentoo.org>
>> +# @AUTHOR:
>> +# Anna Figueiredo Gomes <navi@vlhl.dev>
>> +# Maciej Barć <xgqt@gentoo.org>
>> +# @SUPPORTED_EAPIS: 8
>> +# @PROVIDES: nuget
>> +# @BLURB: common functions and variables for builds using .NET SDK
>> +# @DESCRIPTION:
>> +# This eclass is designed to provide common definitions for .NET packages.
>> +#
>> +# This eclass does not export any phase functions, for that see
>> +# the "dotnet-pkg" eclass.
> 
> Given how intrusive this is, I don't think "-utils" is a correct suffix.
> It's for eclasses providing utility functions without affecting packages
> implicitly.
> 

What about "-common", like "elisp-common.eclass" has?

Any suggestion?

BTW: I will not merge dotnet-pkg and dotnet-pkg-utils because then we 
will get the most perfect spaghetti-code-soup-thing known to men.

-- 
Have a great day!

~ Maciej XGQT Barć

xgqt@gentoo.org
Gentoo Linux developer
(dotnet, emacs, math, ml, nim, scheme, sci)
https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/User:Xgqt
9B0A 4C5D 02A3 B43C 9D6F D6B1 14D7 4A1F 43A6 AC3C