From: Steve Long <slong@rathaus.eclipse.co.uk>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Some ideas on how to reduce territoriality
Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2007 01:19:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f9351u$44v$1@sea.gmane.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: f92kbk$qbl$1@sea.gmane.org
Tiziano Müller wrote:
> Chris Gianelloni schrieb:
>> - arch-specific patches/dependencies - If someone is requesting KEYWORD
>> changes on a package and it requires a patch or additional dependencies
>> for your architecture, you are not only permitted, but really are
>> required to make the necessary changes to add support for your
>> architecture.
> And what is going to happen with the patch? Should go upstream, but
> who's responsible for that?
>
Er, the maintainer; if s/he's not bothered about the package compiling on
different archs, should s/he really be maintaining it? I doubt upstream
would appreciate that from a distro -- and it's not hard to file a quick
bug with a link to the gentoo one; a quick comment on the gentoo one and
any interested users can help upstream to triage it.
>> - metadata.xml changes
> With limitations.
>
Maintainer sounds like a definite no-no. Any others?
>> - Version bumps where the only requirement is to "cp" the ebuild
> Just "cp"'ing the ebuilds is the reason that so many ebuilds are still a
> nightmare and full of little nasty bugs.
>
> This is a complete no-go since there are so many things a careful
> maintainer has to consider (besides checking the packages changelog, the
> dependencies, the license, the docs, etc. he should also check the
> ebuild).
>
Yeah but if they can compile it and it works as an app (however that's
defined, this /is/ usr-land) what's the harm in bumping and allowing others
to test it? (This is unstable, I hope..) If they can't be bothered to do
that, how can they possibly claim to be testing it? (And why are they even
touching it if they're not interested? ;) [I dunno how make test fits into
this, either, as tests were broken for synfig.]
If the maintainer doesn't like it, well s/he's already got the new version
working on one arch/ machine (plus whichever user bugged the dev.) I can't
see anyone really bemoaning a new tester ;P
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-05 0:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-03 22:06 [gentoo-dev] Some ideas on how to reduce territoriality Chris Gianelloni
2007-08-03 22:19 ` Mike Doty
2007-08-03 22:47 ` Chris Gianelloni
2007-08-04 7:21 ` Marius Mauch
2007-08-03 22:23 ` Philipp Riegger
2007-08-03 22:34 ` Petteri Räty
2007-08-03 22:40 ` Donnie Berkholz
2007-08-03 23:03 ` Mike Doty
2007-08-03 23:06 ` Mike Doty
2007-08-03 23:20 ` Robin H. Johnson
2007-08-04 14:43 ` [gentoo-dev] Commitlog-mailinglist (was: Re: Some ideas on how to reduce territoriality) Lars Weiler
2007-08-04 19:32 ` [gentoo-dev] Commitlog-mailinglist Donnie Berkholz
2007-08-06 9:41 ` [gentoo-dev] Commitlog-mailinglist Christian Faulhammer
2007-08-06 12:23 ` [gentoo-dev] Commitlog-mailinglist (was: Re: Some ideas on how to reduce territoriality) Mike Frysinger
2007-08-06 14:43 ` [gentoo-dev] Commitlog-mailinglist Lars Weiler
2007-08-06 15:01 ` Ned Ludd
2007-08-06 15:48 ` Lars Weiler
2007-08-06 16:20 ` Petteri Räty
2007-08-03 22:43 ` [gentoo-dev] Some ideas on how to reduce territoriality Philipp Riegger
2007-08-03 22:23 ` Petteri Räty
2007-08-03 22:49 ` Chris Gianelloni
2007-08-04 7:36 ` Marius Mauch
2007-08-03 22:53 ` Roy Marples
2007-08-04 1:13 ` Luis Francisco Araujo
2007-08-06 19:16 ` Chris Gianelloni
2007-08-07 3:48 ` [gentoo-dev] " Steve Long
2007-08-04 9:06 ` [gentoo-dev] " Alec Warner
2007-08-04 16:29 ` [gentoo-dev] " Steve Long
2007-08-04 17:17 ` Martin Jackson
2007-08-04 17:27 ` [gentoo-dev] " Jeroen Roovers
2007-08-04 17:39 ` Vlastimil Babka
2007-08-04 17:56 ` Steev Klimaszewski
2007-08-04 20:05 ` Petteri Räty
2007-08-04 23:56 ` Jurek Bartuszek
2007-08-05 6:27 ` Jeroen Roovers
2007-08-06 12:26 ` Mike Frysinger
2007-08-06 16:18 ` Petteri Räty
2007-08-07 0:23 ` Mike Frysinger
2007-08-05 0:03 ` [gentoo-dev] " Steve Long
2007-08-05 7:50 ` Petteri Räty
2007-08-04 19:34 ` Tiziano Müller
2007-08-05 0:19 ` Steve Long [this message]
2007-08-05 16:14 ` [gentoo-dev] " Ciaran McCreesh
2007-08-06 14:09 ` [gentoo-dev] " Steve Long
2007-08-06 9:24 ` Christian Faulhammer
2007-08-06 11:16 ` [gentoo-dev] " Paul de Vrieze
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='f9351u$44v$1@sea.gmane.org' \
--to=slong@rathaus.eclipse.co.uk \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox