From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1IHTh6-0004mM-R6 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 05 Aug 2007 00:10:05 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l7508PZR017237; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 00:08:26 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l7504uPP012267 for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 00:04:57 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E492D64A71 for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 00:04:56 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: 0.932 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.932 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-0.569, BAYES_50=0.001, RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO=1.5] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AodOPeaxzHHM for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 00:04:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 326576503F for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2007 00:04:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1IHTb7-0003gw-5z for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Sun, 05 Aug 2007 02:03:53 +0200 Received: from 82.153.194.134 ([82.153.194.134]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 05 Aug 2007 02:03:53 +0200 Received: from slong by 82.153.194.134 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 05 Aug 2007 02:03:53 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Steve Long Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Some ideas on how to reduce territoriality Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2007 01:03:34 +0100 Message-ID: References: <1186178767.8470.47.camel@inertia.twi-31o2.org> <20070804192736.2c854b09@epia.jer-c2.orkz.net> <46B4B9EC.3030808@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.153.194.134 User-Agent: KNode/0.10.4 Sender: news X-Archives-Salt: db590fa4-91f9-49d4-848f-69e945011c9a X-Archives-Hash: a86971586775e26eb77af716d6e0329b Vlastimil Babka wrote: > > dodoc calls should have || die and USE=doc should be tested before > commiting a bump, IMHO > Would it not be easier to roll the || die into dodoc? I know some eclass functions die on error, but I haven't been able to find out what the definitive list is, or at least the policy on how it's decided whether a call should die. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list