From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1IGdYY-0005dY-Ps for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 02 Aug 2007 16:29:47 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l72GSlUC011151; Thu, 2 Aug 2007 16:28:47 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l72GQhiP008820 for ; Thu, 2 Aug 2007 16:26:43 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E20B66549B for ; Thu, 2 Aug 2007 16:26:42 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -1.152 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.152 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-1.153, BAYES_50=0.001] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hRl2E6iMGU4H for ; Thu, 2 Aug 2007 16:26:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7310965665 for ; Thu, 2 Aug 2007 16:26:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1IGdVK-0003vl-J8 for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Thu, 02 Aug 2007 18:26:26 +0200 Received: from dslb-084-061-129-175.pools.arcor-ip.net ([84.61.129.175]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 02 Aug 2007 18:26:26 +0200 Received: from skoehler by dslb-084-061-129-175.pools.arcor-ip.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 02 Aug 2007 18:26:26 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Sven_K=F6hler?= Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: why? pciutils with zlib use-flag went stable on x86 Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2007 18:26:27 +0200 Message-ID: References: <200707291936.57220.carlo@gentoo.org> <200707291945.22728.carlo@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig954F9513974114D4DD13F093" X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: dslb-084-061-129-175.pools.arcor-ip.net User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (Windows/20070509) In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.3.0 Sender: news X-Archives-Salt: a93d37a3-d570-4a25-96a9-123b60dde85e X-Archives-Hash: 9415ddad4f18646c59d83fabdae8ddcb This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig954F9513974114D4DD13F093 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > There are many more ebuilds than just hal which fail with a compressed > pci.ids file. And many of them are non-obvious. It took me more than > I little bit of effort after the zlib USE flag was first added to the > pciutils ebuild to figure out why so many packages where failing... Oh! Really? Which ones? So it seems, there are many many handwritten parsers out there? --------------enig954F9513974114D4DD13F093 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Cygwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGsgWz7Ww7FjRBE4ARAvZ1AKC05egnw+5e3OfDPKWMEk9RAdBC8QCglLNy cij67DUubH1Hgj1ir3997Ok= =iFxF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig954F9513974114D4DD13F093-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list