From: "Sven Köhler" <skoehler@upb.de>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-dev] why? pciutils with zlib use-flag went stable on x86
Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 18:44:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f8ig5t$p6v$1@sea.gmane.org> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 812 bytes --]
Hi,
so today, pciutils-2.2.4-r3 went stable on x86.
It's a known issue, that pciutils compiled with zlib use-flag turned on
(which is default) doesn't work with the version of hal, which is
currently stable on x86.
So at the moment, hal-0.5.9-r1 is stable on x86. It went stable weeks or
even months ago. Now, pciutils-2.2.4-r3 is compiled with zlib use-flag
turned on. There are now warning, errors, or any other messages about
the zlib use-flag - well, until you recompile hal.
The hal-ebuild checks, whether pciutils has been built with or without
the zlib use-flag. But what is this check worth, if people have already
upgraded hal weeks ago and the uncompatibility between pciutils and hal
is now unnoticed?
Why did you provocate this breakage?
This is not a good idea, IMHO.
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 252 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2007-07-29 16:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-29 16:44 Sven Köhler [this message]
2007-07-29 16:53 ` [gentoo-dev] why? pciutils with zlib use-flag went stable on x86 Mart Raudsepp
2007-07-29 17:53 ` [gentoo-dev] " Sven Köhler
2007-07-29 17:27 ` [gentoo-dev] " Wulf C. Krueger
2007-07-29 19:15 ` [gentoo-dev] " Ryan Hill
2007-07-29 21:01 ` Seemant Kulleen
2007-07-29 17:36 ` [gentoo-dev] " Carsten Lohrke
2007-07-29 17:45 ` Carsten Lohrke
2007-07-29 18:04 ` [gentoo-dev] " Sven Köhler
2007-07-29 18:24 ` Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
2007-07-29 18:46 ` Steev Klimaszewski
2007-08-02 12:23 ` James Cloos
2007-08-02 13:15 ` Steve Long
2007-08-03 1:39 ` Chris Gianelloni
2007-08-02 16:26 ` Sven Köhler
2007-08-02 23:19 ` Ryan Hill
2007-08-02 23:50 ` Robin H. Johnson
2007-08-03 0:07 ` Ryan Hill
2007-08-03 1:37 ` Chris Gianelloni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='f8ig5t$p6v$1@sea.gmane.org' \
--to=skoehler@upb.de \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox