From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1IEgGs-0002Td-5S for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 28 Jul 2007 06:59:26 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l6S6wUcv021584; Sat, 28 Jul 2007 06:58:30 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l6S6ubXp019397 for ; Sat, 28 Jul 2007 06:56:38 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDB8364DAA for ; Sat, 28 Jul 2007 06:56:36 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -0.586 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.586 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-0.587, BAYES_50=0.001] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YXeURHaWR9iR for ; Sat, 28 Jul 2007 06:56:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A043264EA4 for ; Sat, 28 Jul 2007 06:56:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1IEgE0-0006ax-G7 for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Sat, 28 Jul 2007 08:56:29 +0200 Received: from static24-72-113-196.yorkton.accesscomm.ca ([24.72.113.196]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 28 Jul 2007 08:56:28 +0200 Received: from dirtyepic by static24-72-113-196.yorkton.accesscomm.ca with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 28 Jul 2007 08:56:28 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Ryan Hill Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Lastrite: x11-misc/fsv Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 00:56:20 -0600 Message-ID: References: <20070721194103.7ef969af@localhost> <200707220127.32835.vapier@gentoo.org> <20070722094913.0c10032f@localhost> <200707220339.36850.vapier@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: static24-72-113-196.yorkton.accesscomm.ca User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.5pre (X11/20070723) In-Reply-To: Sender: news X-Archives-Salt: 7dba9bac-b1cd-4e38-a004-7f8eeb188ba0 X-Archives-Hash: a8e1e5989b6e81515984238e5aecb0ad Ryan Hill wrote: > Steve Long wrote: > >> aiui, if there are no bugs the package goes to maintainer-wanted so a user >> can pick it up for sunrise. > > Almost. Sunrise can only handle maintainer-needed packages; those that > aren't in the tree yet. Bah, I screwed that up. s/needed/wanted/ So yeah, you're right, if it was removed it could go into Sunrise. But the point is upstream not maintaining something is not reason enough for removing it. Upstream not maintaining it and it being broken is. Upstream not maintaining it and it being an unwanted pain in the ass is also popular one. -- dirtyepic you'd be tossed up or wash up, the narrator relates gentoo org in a spartan antarctican walk for many days 9B81 6C9F E791 83BB 3AB3 5B2D E625 A073 8379 37E8 (0x837937E8) -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list