public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [gentoo-dev] stabilization requests not making progress
@ 2020-03-28 15:24 Jaco Kroon
  2020-03-28 16:07 ` Mart Raudsepp
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jaco Kroon @ 2020-03-28 15:24 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo development

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 826 bytes --]

Hi All,

https://bugs.gentoo.org/705754

Not sure if this is the only one.  This is becoming problematic.  This
specific one is blocking a security issue.  x86 and amd64 both needs an
updated stable.  I'd prefer 13.32.0 but it's not been in tree for a
month yet.  But we can do 13.31.0 by now ...


Kind Regards,
Jaco Kroon
C.E.O.

*T:* +27 (0)12 021 0000 | *F:* +27 86 648 8561 | *E:* jaco@iewc.co.za
*W:* iewc.co.za <https://www.iewc.co.za/> | *A:* Unit 201, Building 2B,
Sunwood Park, Queen's Crescent Lynnwood, Pretoria


  	

Facebook <https://www.facebook.com/Interexcel/> Twitter
<https://twitter.com/Interexcel/> Google+
<https://plus.google.com/+InterexcelCoZaPTA/posts> LinkedIn
<https://www.linkedin.com/company/interexcel-world-connection/>

IEWC <https://www.iewc.co.za/> ULS Group <http://www.uls.co.za/>


[-- Attachment #2.1: Type: text/html, Size: 4142 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2.2: ico-facebook.jpg --]
[-- Type: image/jpeg, Size: 1302 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2.3: ico-twitter.jpg --]
[-- Type: image/jpeg, Size: 1423 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2.4: ico-linkedin.jpg --]
[-- Type: image/jpeg, Size: 1444 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2.5: ie.jpg --]
[-- Type: image/jpeg, Size: 3906 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2.6: ulsgroup.jpg --]
[-- Type: image/jpeg, Size: 10458 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-dev] stabilization requests not making progress
  2020-03-28 15:24 [gentoo-dev] stabilization requests not making progress Jaco Kroon
@ 2020-03-28 16:07 ` Mart Raudsepp
  2020-03-28 16:50   ` Jaco Kroon
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Mart Raudsepp @ 2020-03-28 16:07 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-dev; +Cc: Jaco Kroon

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 678 bytes --]

Ühel kenal päeval, L, 28.03.2020 kell 17:24, kirjutas Jaco Kroon:
> Hi All,
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/705754
> Not sure if this is the only one.  This is becoming problematic. 
> This specific one is blocking a security issue.  x86 and amd64 both
> needs an updated stable.  I'd prefer 13.32.0 but it's not been in
> tree for a month yet.  But we can do 13.31.0 by now ...

You should stabilize on the security bug, not an extra one that blocks
the security bug.
Security bugs typically gets more immediate attention by arch teams,
but often not those that are blocked by a dependent non-security bug,
as it doesn't show up in the tooling then as such.


Mart

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 981 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-dev] stabilization requests not making progress
  2020-03-28 16:07 ` Mart Raudsepp
@ 2020-03-28 16:50   ` Jaco Kroon
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jaco Kroon @ 2020-03-28 16:50 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: Mart Raudsepp; +Cc: gentoo development

Hi Mart,

On 2020/03/28 18:07, Mart Raudsepp wrote:

> Ühel kenal päeval, L, 28.03.2020 kell 17:24, kirjutas Jaco Kroon:
>> Hi All,
>> https://bugs.gentoo.org/705754
>> Not sure if this is the only one.  This is becoming problematic. 
>> This specific one is blocking a security issue.  x86 and amd64 both
>> needs an updated stable.  I'd prefer 13.32.0 but it's not been in
>> tree for a month yet.  But we can do 13.31.0 by now ...
> You should stabilize on the security bug, not an extra one that blocks
> the security bug.
> Security bugs typically gets more immediate attention by arch teams,
> but often not those that are blocked by a dependent non-security bug,
> as it doesn't show up in the tooling then as such.

Thank you.  I flagged the stabilization bug as obsolute and added the
package list to the security bug and added the two related arch teams
there instead.

It still worries me that stabilization takes this long.  Is this perhaps
a process which we can automate in some way?

Kind Regards,
Jaco



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2020-03-28 16:50 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-03-28 15:24 [gentoo-dev] stabilization requests not making progress Jaco Kroon
2020-03-28 16:07 ` Mart Raudsepp
2020-03-28 16:50   ` Jaco Kroon

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox