From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-89804-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D351138334
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Sat, 21 Dec 2019 11:41:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 318BEE095C;
	Sat, 21 Dec 2019 11:41:43 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (woodpecker.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA49BE085A
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 21 Dec 2019 11:41:42 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.1.100] (c-98-218-46-55.hsd1.md.comcast.net [98.218.46.55])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	(Authenticated sender: mjo)
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A88CF34D6CF
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 21 Dec 2019 11:41:41 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 0/3] elisp{,-common}.eclass update for
 emacs-vcs consolidation
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
References: <cover.1576663643.git.ulm@gentoo.org>
 <3002c804-e70f-5b50-ee38-d91aa7e22fb0@gentoo.org>
 <w6gtv5xpp7t.fsf@kph.uni-mainz.de>
 <f41351af-f778-081b-9643-0a5969185498@gentoo.org>
 <a5d31d6d-6a96-0087-cc23-bd242759f34b@gentoo.org>
 <w6go8w2mai5.fsf@kph.uni-mainz.de>
 <a4a48386-1931-a42c-d031-d9abe89a2012@gentoo.org>
 <w6gwoaplxgb.fsf@kph.uni-mainz.de>
From: Michael Orlitzky <mjo@gentoo.org>
Message-ID: <f8768df9-092c-6b10-2a9a-6056ffeb8439@gentoo.org>
Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2019 06:41:39 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.3.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <w6gwoaplxgb.fsf@kph.uni-mainz.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: 6a2598f2-8a80-43d6-bd56-9a335172df96
X-Archives-Hash: a89c0c9309ca9619800fafde65e49491

On 12/21/19 6:39 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>>>>>> On Sat, 21 Dec 2019, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> 
>> I was being safe, and assuming that your standards for shell scripting
>> are as low as your standards for tree quality.
> 
> Nice, resorting to a personal attack when out of arguments. :(
> 

I'm not out of arguments because you haven't addressed any of them. You
just said you were going to ignore the policy and break things anyway.
And then you tried to use my suggestion to be extra careful and run a CI
check against me, which is obnoxious, so there you go.