From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1IAbEV-0003JS-6M for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 00:48:07 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l6H0lARs012423; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 00:47:10 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l6H0jEGo010157 for ; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 00:45:15 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A785645F9 for ; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 00:45:14 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: 0.603 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.603 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-0.898, BAYES_50=0.001, RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO=1.5] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GPOlwwnXm0UI for ; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 00:45:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8DDB64BCA for ; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 00:45:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from root by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1IAbBW-0007i6-VU for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 02:45:02 +0200 Received: from 82.152.213.54 ([82.152.213.54]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 02:45:02 +0200 Received: from slong by 82.152.213.54 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 02:45:02 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Steve Long Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: ML changes Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 01:28:17 +0100 Message-ID: References: <46968E00.4070202@gentoo.org> <20070716210207.0f1b8508@Aristotle.01welp.co.uk> <20070716211248.7a269007@snowflake> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.152.213.54 User-Agent: KNode/0.10.4 Sender: news X-Archives-Salt: e21d2743-a9b3-4da4-b480-f78ad34f97c2 X-Archives-Hash: 471d1644cd8a070a9e96ba3408e4a7f0 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 21:02:07 +0100 > Peter Weller >> The moderators should get the final word, end of. > > That would only work if Gentoo could find decent moderator Sorry I know I said "ignore thread" but really: just cos the forum mods banned you it really doesn't make them "indecent" moderators.. It just means you need to change your behaviour. Think about it. > who are > prepared to put lots of effort into work that is, let's face it, > entirely unnecessary and serving no point beyond letting a few people > able to be seen to be 'doing something'. > Yes dear. _yawn_ And now Ignore Thread really _is_ on. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list