From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1IAav9-0001Lp-SM for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 00:28:08 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l6H0REFu023999; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 00:27:14 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l6H0PAss021364 for ; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 00:25:11 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 305E56514A for ; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 00:25:10 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: 0.592 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.592 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-0.909, BAYES_50=0.001, RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO=1.5] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K8FTk6iDiwu6 for ; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 00:25:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC31F6510C for ; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 00:25:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from root by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1IAas9-0005iT-VH for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 02:25:01 +0200 Received: from 82.152.213.54 ([82.152.213.54]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 02:25:01 +0200 Received: from slong by 82.152.213.54 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 02:25:01 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Steve Long Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: ML changes Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 01:25:30 +0100 Message-ID: References: <46968E00.4070202@gentoo.org> <1184536747.18353.55.camel@sputnik886.lnet> <469B0DC2.2070903@gentoo.org> <469BB60D.1030201@gmail.com> <20070716113526.27340ee8@localhost> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.152.213.54 User-Agent: KNode/0.10.4 Sender: news X-Archives-Salt: 3453f6a2-7367-4d73-a6ce-95774a1f0f8a X-Archives-Hash: 6489731bc8b900c24de4aee1db6bbfe2 Donnie Berkholz wrote: >> Just because developers develop because they want to doesn't mean >> they dont want to be part of a community, if that wasn't the case >> then none of the current developers would have originally been part >> of the userbase to begin with. > > What relevance does this have to anything I said? I wasn't addressing > anything about being part of communities; I was addressing the > motivation of volunteers contributing to Gentoo. > Well maybe you should bear in mind that you are talking in front of the whole community. Reply-To Munging? irrelevant ofc. Amateurs.. Sorry amne, but they are.. How many of them are even over 30, as a percentage? /ignore Thread is now on.. honestly guys, grow up. Flames off-list please. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list