From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1IAas5-000261-Tm for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 00:24:58 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l6H0NRWf018959; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 00:23:27 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l6H0K9Kr014528 for ; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 00:20:09 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F8DD64FCF for ; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 00:20:09 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: 0.495 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.495 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-0.820, BAYES_40=-0.185, RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO=1.5] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OwRAsVe92-Jk for ; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 00:20:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5575B64F1D for ; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 00:20:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from root by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1IAanJ-00059w-W9 for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 02:20:02 +0200 Received: from 82.152.213.54 ([82.152.213.54]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 02:20:01 +0200 Received: from slong by 82.152.213.54 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 17 Jul 2007 02:20:01 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Steve Long Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: ML changes Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 01:18:48 +0100 Message-ID: References: <46968E00.4070202@gentoo.org> <1184536747.18353.55.camel@sputnik886.lnet> <469A9DD4.7090407@gentoo.org> <469AE28A.3050700@burnieanglican.org.au> <1184623580.7942.6.camel@inertia.twi-31o2.org> <469BF196.3040206@gmail.com> <1184627366.7942.51.camel@inertia.twi-31o2.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.152.213.54 User-Agent: KNode/0.10.4 Sender: news X-Archives-Salt: 325f35e2-6584-4c96-9144-ab3e70636977 X-Archives-Hash: a91aff6dd11245e61921777047a57918 Chris Gianelloni wrote: > On Mon, 2007-07-16 at 23:30 +0100, George Prowse wrote: >> This is going to crash and burn but wouldn't it be an ideal job >> description for the proctors? Instead of telling people off they could >> just stop people posting. That way you dont even get to know that they >> are even there. > > Seeing as how our original ideas for how the proctors would work pretty > much fell exactly in line with this, I would say "yes" to your question. > So why did you shaft them? > Of course, I now tend to agree that having a larger pool of mods for > gentoo-dev is probably better. It allows any developer to participate, > reducing the "good ol' boy" argument, since participation is open to all > developers. > OFC you do! -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list