From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1IATLu-0006Kn-6b for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 16 Jul 2007 16:23:14 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l6GGMF7D016859; Mon, 16 Jul 2007 16:22:15 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l6GGKKZX014587 for ; Mon, 16 Jul 2007 16:20:20 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DB53650DC for ; Mon, 16 Jul 2007 16:20:20 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: 0.578 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.578 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-0.923, BAYES_50=0.001, RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO=1.5] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0FFFHkwtCxka for ; Mon, 16 Jul 2007 16:20:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D0BC64BFF for ; Mon, 16 Jul 2007 16:20:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1IATIx-0001Yz-V0 for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Mon, 16 Jul 2007 18:20:11 +0200 Received: from 82.152.213.54 ([82.152.213.54]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 16 Jul 2007 18:20:11 +0200 Received: from slong by 82.152.213.54 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 16 Jul 2007 18:20:11 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Steve Long Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: council and proctors Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 17:22:16 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20070715005917.105c8d89@terciopelo.krait.us> <200707151711.57033.drizzt@gentoo.org> <20070716150831.GA9769@superlupo.rechner> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.152.213.54 User-Agent: KNode/0.10.4 Sender: news X-Archives-Salt: 752346fb-4028-4a61-9205-501e041870d8 X-Archives-Hash: 4296349b78e846032b19a53550a398f1 Wernfried Haas wrote: > On Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 05:11:56PM +0200, Timothy Redaelli wrote: >> I have always thought that proctors/COC is useless, I vote to remove it. > > Proctors have already been removed in the last council meeting. > As far the CoC is concerned, i'm not sure what the current status is > and if anyone is supposed to enforce it atm (devrel? userrel?). > Is it just me, or has the current Council grown bored of posting links to the logs to this list? There seem to be an awful lot of unannounced, unlogged meetings, and one is at a loss to know whether these have been full meetings or the "two of us got together and decided" sort of affair. Code and conduct: the only things that really count. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list