From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1M6XJu-0005OM-H4 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 19 May 2009 21:57:58 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4FCDCE03FF; Tue, 19 May 2009 21:57:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from IMPaqm2.telefonica.net (impaqm2.telefonica.net [213.4.149.62]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6287E042B for ; Tue, 19 May 2009 21:57:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from IMPmailhost5.adm.correo ([10.20.102.126]) by IMPaqm2.telefonica.net with bizsmtp id tZwi1b00s2jdgqJ3MZxaVt; Tue, 19 May 2009 23:57:34 +0200 Received: from jesgue.homelinux.org ([78.136.66.163]) by IMPmailhost5.adm.correo with BIZ IMP id tZxZ1b0083XLmEe1lZxaDY; Tue, 19 May 2009 23:57:34 +0200 X-TE-authinfo: authemail="i92guboj.terra.es" |auth_email="i92guboj@terra.es" X-TE-AcuTerraCos: auth_cuTerraCos="cosuitera01" Received: from 192.168.0.10 (SquirrelMail authenticated user i92guboj) by jesgue.homelinux.org with HTTP; Tue, 19 May 2009 23:57:38 +0200 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <200905192343.01544.rbu@gentoo.org> References: <4A130DF4.4000600@gmail.com> <200905192343.01544.rbu@gentoo.org> Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 23:57:38 +0200 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Gentoo Support Everywhere From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jes=FAs_Guerrero?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.5.2 [SVN] Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 3a641c5c-e332-4c92-a7d7-a10ccfc22711 X-Archives-Hash: cd57ada776d393b7205e069153b0456a On Tue, May 19, 2009 23:42, Robert Buchholz wrote: > On Tuesday 19 May 2009, Jes=FAs Guerrero wrote: > >> On Tue, May 19, 2009 21:52, Dale wrote: >> >>> Also, the link to your thread does not exist. I get "The topic or >>> post you requested does not exist". >> >> The project should be viewable. The forum post will only be >> visible for mods, admins and devs I guess, and only when loged in=B7 >> There's nothing I can do about that. >> > > I get the same error (logged in). I don't know why it is restricted, bu= t > since you announced the thread as containing the rationale for the proj= ect, > it was rather hard to follow the reasons. Thanks for stating them in th= e > mail I am replying to. I don't know what the problem is with the forum thread, but it's there, I swear :) Anyway you are welcome. If you have questions just ask. That's what the RFC is for after all. > Do we need this to be a top-level project? I imagine this might live as > a sub-project of the Forums TLP. No idea. I am new to this whole project thing. I guess that the correct question to ask is whether the forum project team cares at all about this (I guess the answer would be no, at least not as a project, though some individuals might care). With that in mind I doubt they will be willing to have yet another thing to worry about. But I can't speak on behalf of them of course. I really don't care if this is a top level project or a subproject. So, what do people think about this? By the way, thanks for the comments. :) --=20 Jes=FAs Guerrero