From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1I9kLg-0000pU-SW for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 14 Jul 2007 16:20:01 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l6EGJ4qR005122; Sat, 14 Jul 2007 16:19:04 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l6EGHAGd002887 for ; Sat, 14 Jul 2007 16:17:10 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14515650FB for ; Sat, 14 Jul 2007 16:17:10 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -0.689 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.689 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-0.690, BAYES_50=0.001] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YvU2hdIx+zfs for ; Sat, 14 Jul 2007 16:17:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1357F651CA for ; Sat, 14 Jul 2007 16:17:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1I9kIa-0006D1-54 for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Sat, 14 Jul 2007 18:16:48 +0200 Received: from static24-72-113-196.yorkton.accesscomm.ca ([24.72.113.196]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 14 Jul 2007 18:16:48 +0200 Received: from dirtyepic by static24-72-113-196.yorkton.accesscomm.ca with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 14 Jul 2007 18:16:48 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Ryan Hill Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: ML changes Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2007 10:16:36 -0600 Message-ID: References: <4697CE3F.9000308@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: static24-72-113-196.yorkton.accesscomm.ca User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.5pre (X11/20070713) In-Reply-To: <4697CE3F.9000308@gentoo.org> Sender: news X-Archives-Salt: 1631b334-2e88-4328-bedb-5cdbcec25d26 X-Archives-Hash: 3821268af38a959ecf233866d3592d68 Christina Fullam wrote: > I think everyone is overlooking the part included previously: > "An additional method discussed was to have all non-dev emails on a > timeout, pick a number of hours, and then the email if not moderated > would be released. (non-dev sends his email, time period expires and no > one booted it, so the email rolls through)" > > This means that non-dev emails will still be sent to the list, just at a > delay. This same delay can and will be exercised against developers > if the developer demonstrates a justification for it. > This also means that non-dev input will be accepted and viewed as it > always has, the only change is that there is a delay. Then what, exactly, is the damned point? The problem this is supposedly intended to solve is that -dev is too high-volume. This solution requires people to actually put MORE effort into reading -dev than they previously did. No one is going to actually do any monitoring, so all you've done is made posts from non-dev accounts time delayed. Why? -- dirtyepic salesman said this vacuum's guaranteed gentoo org it could suck an ancient virus from the sea 9B81 6C9F E791 83BB 3AB3 5B2D E625 A073 8379 37E8 (0x837937E8) -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list