From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1I9XU3-0004Xb-VT for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 14 Jul 2007 02:35:48 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l6E2YlXq031004; Sat, 14 Jul 2007 02:34:47 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l6E2Wjji028550 for ; Sat, 14 Jul 2007 02:32:46 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6221E65068 for ; Sat, 14 Jul 2007 02:32:45 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: 0.32 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.32 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-0.070, BAYES_05=-1.11, RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO=1.5] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id o28Dk3taVJJr for ; Sat, 14 Jul 2007 02:32:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 868CE64F10 for ; Sat, 14 Jul 2007 02:32:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1I9XQu-0000iX-Qv for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Sat, 14 Jul 2007 04:32:32 +0200 Received: from 82.153.141.64 ([82.153.141.64]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 14 Jul 2007 04:32:32 +0200 Received: from slong by 82.153.141.64 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 14 Jul 2007 04:32:32 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Steve Long Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: ML changes Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2007 03:34:21 +0100 Message-ID: References: <46968E00.4070202@gentoo.org> <6A752AC1698E43C28C8DEFEFF0562BB8@twi31o2.org> <75C450B6-4E1C-4AE0-9424-8BD6B88F8AA8@gentoo.org> <1184288203.5568.3.camel@localhost> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.153.141.64 User-Agent: KNode/0.10.4 Sender: news X-Archives-Salt: 110c0d7a-1bf1-48e7-851a-eec977e9fefa X-Archives-Hash: 6ec57485b59c9598345d6a69218825b2 Ned Ludd wrote: > On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 02:17 +0200, Robert Buchholz wrote: > >> I have to second the voices that a lot of user mails are productive. >> I did >> not do any stats, but I feel that most mails to -dev are currently by >> Gentoo >> devs anyway, so it will not seriously reduce the amount of mail in >> total. > > FYI we do have stats.. > > http://archives.gentoo.org/stats/gentoo-dev-per-month.xml > http://archives.gentoo.org/stats/gentoo-dev-per-year.xml > http://archives.gentoo.org/stats/ > None of which have anything to do with the matter at hand, ie the proportion of non-dev to dev emails. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list