From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62)
(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-25043-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@gentoo.org>)
id 1I9XU3-0004Xb-VT
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 14 Jul 2007 02:35:48 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l6E2YlXq031004;
Sat, 14 Jul 2007 02:34:47 GMT
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l6E2Wjji028550
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 14 Jul 2007 02:32:46 GMT
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6221E65068
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 14 Jul 2007 02:32:45 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.32
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.32 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-0.070, BAYES_05=-1.11,
RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO=1.5]
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id o28Dk3taVJJr for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>;
Sat, 14 Jul 2007 02:32:43 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2])
(using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 868CE64F10
for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Sat, 14 Jul 2007 02:32:41 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43)
id 1I9XQu-0000iX-Qv
for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Sat, 14 Jul 2007 04:32:32 +0200
Received: from 82.153.141.64 ([82.153.141.64])
by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Sat, 14 Jul 2007 04:32:32 +0200
Received: from slong by 82.153.141.64 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Sat, 14 Jul 2007 04:32:32 +0200
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
From: Steve Long <slong@rathaus.eclipse.co.uk>
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: ML changes
Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2007 03:34:21 +0100
Message-ID: <f79cjk$v55$2@sea.gmane.org>
References: <46968E00.4070202@gentoo.org> <6A752AC1698E43C28C8DEFEFF0562BB8@twi31o2.org> <75C450B6-4E1C-4AE0-9424-8BD6B88F8AA8@gentoo.org> <1184288203.5568.3.camel@localhost>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.153.141.64
User-Agent: KNode/0.10.4
Sender: news <news@sea.gmane.org>
X-Archives-Salt: 110c0d7a-1bf1-48e7-851a-eec977e9fefa
X-Archives-Hash: 6ec57485b59c9598345d6a69218825b2
Ned Ludd wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 02:17 +0200, Robert Buchholz wrote:
>
>> I have to second the voices that a lot of user mails are productive.
>> I did
>> not do any stats, but I feel that most mails to -dev are currently by
>> Gentoo
>> devs anyway, so it will not seriously reduce the amount of mail in
>> total.
>
> FYI we do have stats..
>
> http://archives.gentoo.org/stats/gentoo-dev-per-month.xml
> http://archives.gentoo.org/stats/gentoo-dev-per-year.xml
> http://archives.gentoo.org/stats/
>
None of which have anything to do with the matter at hand, ie the proportion
of non-dev to dev emails.
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list