From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-83712-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D0C321382C5
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Wed, 31 Jan 2018 13:16:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 553B4E0B89;
	Wed, 31 Jan 2018 13:16:22 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from odin.troglodyte.be (odin.troglodyte.be [185.157.247.136])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC752E0AEC
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 31 Jan 2018 13:16:21 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail.troglodyte.be (localhost [IPv6:::1])
	by odin.troglodyte.be (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 532A7C2805C4
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 31 Jan 2018 14:16:02 +0100 (CET)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2018 13:16:02 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: nado@troglodyte.be
Message-ID: <f789112c33ba5328f48dbe71d25b7356@troglodyte.be>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] use.desc: Correct/clarify
 SSL/TLS-related flags
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
In-Reply-To: <23153.37406.445528.171039@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de>
References: <23153.37406.445528.171039@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de>
 <20180130221106.11245-1-mgorny@gentoo.org>
 <23152.65107.266869.334200@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de>
 <CAHY5MeeDpAB6oMH-9CczG-xtnFgYPzd+XVHTqA4uB4fOFNQeCQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-Archives-Salt: 7c0441fa-d264-453a-9c24-41994e07d56d
X-Archives-Hash: 0ed63669361d4d959e515f3006b76368

January 31, 2018 10:53 AM, "Ulrich Mueller" <ulm@gentoo.org> wrote:=0A> T=
he gnutls flag doesn't have the meaning "I want gnutls". It has=0A> the m=
eaning "I prefer net-libs/gnutls as SSL/TLS provider". So with=0A> USE=3D=
"-ssl" the gnutls flag is a no-op, and neither the ebuild nor=0A> the use=
r should have to care about it.=0A> =0A> Ulrich=0A=0AI agree, it is bothe=
rsome to have to add extra negative use flags when it could be ignored.=
=0A=0A--=0ACorentin =E2=80=9CNado=E2=80=9D Pazdera