From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1I9C9N-0002la-Fn for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 13 Jul 2007 03:49:01 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l6D3m6eF028631; Fri, 13 Jul 2007 03:48:06 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l6D3k7W3026322 for ; Fri, 13 Jul 2007 03:46:08 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68F3E65693 for ; Fri, 13 Jul 2007 03:46:07 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -1.983 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.983 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=0.616, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MatnuNl8QuHL for ; Fri, 13 Jul 2007 03:46:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55C1D6580D for ; Fri, 13 Jul 2007 03:46:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1I9C6I-0001Gb-M4 for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Fri, 13 Jul 2007 05:45:51 +0200 Received: from static24-72-113-196.yorkton.accesscomm.ca ([24.72.113.196]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 13 Jul 2007 05:45:50 +0200 Received: from dirtyepic by static24-72-113-196.yorkton.accesscomm.ca with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 13 Jul 2007 05:45:50 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Ryan Hill Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: ML changes Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 21:45:42 -0600 Message-ID: References: <46968E00.4070202@gentoo.org> <1184290893.6336.73.camel@ashe.anyarch.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: static24-72-113-196.yorkton.accesscomm.ca User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.5pre (X11/20070709) In-Reply-To: <1184290893.6336.73.camel@ashe.anyarch.net> Sender: news X-Archives-Salt: 0c907834-5b0c-4460-a597-9c949690f6db X-Archives-Hash: 4326f2fa164f989da5a029534093c2e5 Daniel Ostrow wrote: > I as a developer find it very difficult to cut though what I consider > noise to find the bits that I consider important to being able to > continue being an effective developer on a list that I am *required* to > be subscribed to. We have considered the likes of a moderated list, an > announce only list and now this sillyness to help in cutting down on > what a lot of us see as noise. How about we try something else....a self > moderated quasi-announce list... Now this idea I really like. Some things have to be considered though, the biggest one being how to ensure that the decisions and consensus of the discussions on -dev actually make their way over to -dev-info. Also how to handle sub-thread tangents and etc. All in all, I think it's worth thinking about. -- dirtyepic salesman said this vacuum's guaranteed gentoo org it could suck an ancient virus from the sea 9B81 6C9F E791 83BB 3AB3 5B2D E625 A073 8379 37E8 (0x837937E8) -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list