From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B7F2158041 for ; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 15:25:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 65CD3E29B9; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 15:25:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (woodpecker.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D8E6DE29B6 for ; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 15:25:37 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: banning "AI"-backed (LLM/GPT/whatever) contributions to Gentoo From: =?UTF-8?Q?Micha=C5=82_G=C3=B3rny?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 16:25:32 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: Organization: Gentoo Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-2OX+v7EB+M8x/0vsH75l" User-Agent: Evolution 3.50.4 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Archives-Salt: 18fb69fa-cbe0-4ab7-9302-01896b908eda X-Archives-Hash: 3100efe35e2ce94b894c40f81f4dd8a2 --=-2OX+v7EB+M8x/0vsH75l Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2024-02-27 at 15:45 +0100, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > Given the recent spread of the "AI" bubble, I think we really need to > look into formally addressing the related concerns. In my opinion, > at this point the only reasonable course of action would be to safely > ban "AI"-backed contribution entirely. In other words, explicitly > forbid people from using ChatGPT, Bard, GitHub Copilot, and so on, to > create ebuilds, code, documentation, messages, bug reports and so on for > use in Gentoo. >=20 > Just to be clear, I'm talking about our "original" content. We can't do > much about upstream projects using it. Since I've been asked to flesh out a specific motion, here's what I propose specifically: """ It is expressly forbidden to contribute to Gentoo any content that has been created with the assistance of Natural Language Processing artificial intelligence tools. This motion can be revisited, should a case been made over such a tool that does not pose copyright, ethical and quality concerns. """ This explicitly covers all GPTs, including ChatGPT and Copilot, which is the category causing the most concern at the moment. At the same time, it doesn't block more specific uses of machine learning to problem solving. Special thanks to Arthur Zamarin for consulting me on this. --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny --=-2OX+v7EB+M8x/0vsH75l Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQFGBAABCgAwFiEEx2qEUJQJjSjMiybFY5ra4jKeJA4FAmX8UWwSHG1nb3JueUBn ZW50b28ub3JnAAoJEGOa2uIyniQO+okH/j1EGuPvFkWjymZi1F3GJI9Enst5ngUc Cb2Q8yK1HDjM/5O6l00QeNdt4/XEWfS8X8I2ckoWmDFEoB9a3DXPtcnfDrK25CNg fwW/Asb6l8eTPX9xLgIqgk4oYw8b/LU3ZQ5kkHiyZMOCOeB2bYz1k5E+rO2KIl6G 56ITC6bKasGE0ADjp8po09Mf+TkV/a1GIpfD34O4is92J+QfX7veM02t5JDnpwmp 9WRV7uKKPqFwkR81iaxzO5yDecAkL5mrhztPdeVdfqdIJc/wWhZIUyOeSQ2fPh6G hhffLRU7foO3l5sCKO260d5vNbBzBiWThFtwti5OhSXfE1vs1HwbDjA= =7D3v -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-2OX+v7EB+M8x/0vsH75l--